Yrityksen johtaja panostaa tuotekehityksen skaalaamiseen.

Questions & Answers about Yrityksen johtaja panostaa tuotekehityksen skaalaamiseen.

Why does skaalaamiseen end in -miseen rather than being a regular infinitive?
The verb panostaa (to invest effort/resources into) demands the illative case ("into what"). When the target is an action (scaling), we must use the 4th infinitive (the -minen form, which turns a verb into a noun). Putting skaalaaminen into the illative case gives us skaalaamiseen.
Why is the word for "product development" in the genitive case (tuotekehityksen)?
When an action verb is turned into a noun (like skaalaaminen), the word that would normally be its object is instead attached as a genitive modifier. You can think of it as literally saying "the scaling of the product development."
Could we use the 3rd infinitive illative (skaalaamaan) with panostaa instead?
No, you cannot say panostaa skaalaamaan. The 3rd infinitive illative (-maan or -mään) is typically used with verbs of motion (like mennä, to go) or state (like jäädä, to stay). Panostaa is an activity-focus verb, which means it treats the target activity as a concept or entity. Because of this, it strictly requires the noun-like 4th infinitive (-minen) in the illative case.
Is there a difference between panostaa and sijoittaa for "investing" in this context?
Panostaa implies investing effort, time, or general resources (like a director focusing a team's energy on a project). If you are talking strictly about investing money financially (e.g., into stocks or companies), you would use sijoittaa. Both verbs, however, share the exact same rection: they both require the illative case (mihin or -miseen).

Learn Yrityksen johtaja panostaa tuotekehityksen skaalaamiseen and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free