Puhujaa hikoiluttaa, koska esitelmä on pitkä.

Questions & Answers about Puhujaa hikoiluttaa, koska esitelmä on pitkä.

Why is puhujaa in the partitive case here instead of the nominative puhuja?
This is the partitive experiencer structure you are currently learning. With certain verbs describing feelings or physical sensations like hikoiluttaa, the person experiencing the feeling is put in the partitive. Think of it literally as 'it makes the speaker sweat'. Because there is no grammatical subject performing the action, the verb stays in the 3rd person singular.
I know the verb hikoilla means 'to sweat'. Why are we using hikoiluttaa here?
Hikoiluttaa is a causative verb derived from hikoilla. While hikoilla takes a normal nominative subject (for example, puhuja hikoilee), hikoiluttaa expresses an involuntary sensation and requires the partitive experiencer structure. You will often see the -tta- or -ttä- ending on verbs that trigger this subjectless emotion syntax.
Is there a difference in meaning between puhujaa hikoiluttaa and puhuja hikoilee?
The English translation is usually the same, but the Finnish nuance is slightly different. Puhuja hikoilee simply states the physical action of sweating. Puhujaa hikoiluttaa focuses more on the internal, involuntary feeling of being hot and sweaty.
Why is pitkä in the nominative case instead of the partitive?
In the second clause (koska esitelmä on pitkä), we are back to a normal sentence structure. Esitelmä (the presentation) is a singular, countable subject. When describing a singular countable noun with the verb olla, the adjective stays in the nominative case. You would only use the partitive if the subject was an uncountable mass noun, like coffee or weather.

Learn Puhujaa hikoiluttaa, koska esitelmä on pitkä and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free