Breakdown of Hän joutui kaatamaan hyökkääjän yhdellä lyönnillä.
hän
he / she
yksi
one
joutua
to have to, to end up (having to)
hyökkääjä
the attacker
Questions & Answers about Hän joutui kaatamaan hyökkääjän yhdellä lyönnillä.
Why is the verb "to knock down" in the form kaatamaan instead of the basic dictionary form kaataa?
The verb joutua (to end up having to / to be forced to) requires the following verb to be in the third infinitive illative form, which ends in -maan or -mään. Because of this rule, kaataa becomes kaatamaan. If the sentence used alkaa (to start) instead, it would take the basic first infinitive: Hän alkoi kaataa...
Does joutui just mean the same thing as täytyi (had to)?
They are similar, but joutua carries a stronger feeling of ending up in an unavoidable or unwanted situation. While täytyi is a neutral "had to", joutui implies the person was forced by circumstances into doing it. This is why it is often translated as "ended up having to".
Why is the attacker (hyökkääjä) written with an -n at the end as hyökkääjän?
It is the object of the sentence. Because there is a clear subject (Hän) performing a completed action on a single whole object, the object takes the genitive-accusative -n ending.
How does the ending -llä in yhdellä lyönnillä translate to "with"?