Questions & Answers about Tuo on voittajan syömä chili!
Why is 'Tuo' used here instead of a quality adjective like 'tuollainen'?
Tuo is a simple demonstrative pronoun pointing to a specific thing ('that exact one'). The word tuollainen means 'that kind of' or 'like that'. If you wanted to say 'That is the kind of chili a winner eats!', you would use Tuollaista on voittajan syömä chili. Because we are pointing out the actual, specific chili the winner ate, we just use Tuo.
What grammatical structure creates 'voittajan syömä'?
This is the agent participle, recognized by the -ma or -mä ending added to the verb's strong stem. It acts like an adjective to describe an action completed by someone specific. The person who did the action (the agent) is always in the genitive case, which is why voittaja (winner) becomes voittajan.
Is it common to talk like this, or could I use a 'joka' (which) clause?
The agent participle is very common in standard and written Finnish, but in everyday spoken language, Finns often use a relative clause with joka. You could absolutely say Tuo on se chili, jonka voittaja söi! (That is the chili which the winner ate!). Both are entirely correct and mean the same thing.
Does the participle 'syömä' need to match the case of 'chili'?