English points with two words: this (near) and that (far). Finnish points with three: tämä, tuo, and se. The extra term fills a gap English speakers do not even notice they have — a "that, over by you" — and, on top of that, one of the three (se) quietly does the job of the English article "the." Getting this three-way split right is one of the quickest ways to stop sounding like a translated-from-English learner.
The three demonstratives
| Finnish | English | Where the thing is |
|---|---|---|
| tämä | this | near the speaker — in my hand, right here |
| tuo | that | near the listener or visible "over there" — pointable |
| se | it / that | already known, mentioned, out of sight, or abstract |
Tämä kirja on hyvä, mutta tuo on parempi.
This book is good, but that one (over there) is better.
Muistatko sen elokuvan, josta puhuimme?
Do you remember that movie we talked about?
The logic is not simply near vs. far — it is speaker vs. listener vs. shared knowledge:
- tämä — the thing is in my sphere. I am holding it, it is right next to me.
- tuo — the thing is in your sphere, or somewhere we can both see and point at. This is the term English lacks.
- se — the thing is neither here nor pointably there; it is something we both already know about — because it was mentioned, or it is out of sight, or it is an idea.
Mikä tämä on?
What is this? (holding it up)
Kuka tuo on?
Who is that? (nodding toward someone across the room)
Se oli hyvä idea.
That was a good idea. (an idea already in the conversation)
The plurals: nämä, nuo, ne
Each demonstrative has a plural. They follow the same three-way logic.
| Singular | Plural | English |
|---|---|---|
| tämä | nämä | this → these |
| tuo | nuo | that → those (by you / visible) |
| se | ne | it/that → they/those (known) |
Nämä ovat minun kenkäni.
These are my shoes.
Nuo omenat näyttävät hyviltä.
Those apples look good.
Ne ovat vielä autossa.
They're still in the car.
Note that ne is also the everyday "they" — both for things (standard) and, in speech, for people (covered on the spoken pronouns page).
se does the work of "the"
Finnish has no articles — no a, no the. But it is not blind to definiteness: when it matters, se steps in to mark "the one we both know." Placed before a noun, se signals "that (particular, already-established) one," which is exactly what English "the" does.
Laita se kirja pöydälle.
Put the book on the table. (the specific book we mean)
Ostitko sen leivän?
Did you buy the bread? (the bread we discussed)
This is why se feels so different from tämä and tuo. Those two point; se refers back. It picks out something already anchored in the conversation — which is precisely the boundary between English "this/that" (pointing) and "the" (referring to the known). Definiteness in Finnish leans on se rather than on an article.
se is also "it"
The same word se is the third-person pronoun for things — the "it" you met among the personal pronouns. So se wears three hats: demonstrative "that (known)," the definiteness-marker "the," and the pronoun "it." Context separates them effortlessly.
Missä on avaimeni? — Se on pöydällä.
Where are my keys? — It's on the table.
Se maistuu hyvältä.
It tastes good.
A first look at the case forms
Like everything in Finnish, demonstratives decline. The full paradigm has its own page, but here are the three you meet first — genitive, partitive, and inessive:
| tämä | tuo | se | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nominative | tämä | tuo | se |
| Genitive | tämän | tuon | sen |
| Partitive | tätä | tuota | sitä |
| Inessive (in) | tässä | tuossa | siinä |
Otatko tämän vai tuon?
Will you take this one or that one?
En ole nähnyt tätä ennen.
I haven't seen this before.
The place-adverbs täällä / tuolla ("here / over there") and tänne / tuonne ("to here / to over there") grow from the same three-way root; they have their own here-and-there system.
Common Mistakes
❌ Kuka se on? (pointing at a visible person across the room).
Mismatched deixis — if you're pointing at someone visible, use tuo.
✅ Kuka tuo on?
Who is that? (pointing)
❌ Muistatko tuon elokuvan, josta puhuimme?
Wrong term — an already-mentioned thing (not pointed at) is se.
✅ Muistatko sen elokuvan, josta puhuimme?
Do you remember that movie we talked about?
❌ Nama ovat hyviä.
Missing umlaut — 'nama' is not a word; the plural of tämä is nämä.
✅ Nämä ovat hyviä.
These are good.
❌ Hunting for a word for 'the' before every known noun.
Finnish has no article — se supplies definiteness when it's needed.
✅ Laita se kirja tähän.
Put the book here.
❌ Nuo ovat autossa (about keys already mentioned, out of sight).
Out-of-sight, known things are ne, not nuo (which points at visible ones).
✅ Ne ovat autossa.
They're in the car.
Key Takeaways
- Finnish points three ways: tämä (near me), tuo (by you / visible), se (known / abstract).
- The split is speaker–listener–shared knowledge, not just near–far.
- tuo is the term English lacks — use it when pointing at something visible.
- Plurals: nämä, nuo, ne.
- se also marks definiteness ("the") and means "it" — three roles, one word, sorted by context.
Now practice Finnish
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Finnish→Related Topics
- Declining Demonstratives: tämä, tuo, seB1 — The irregular case stems of tämä, tuo, se and the plurals nämä, nuo, ne — including the notorious si-/sii- stem of se.
- se vs hän: People, Things, and SpeechA2 — Written Finnish uses hän for people and se for things — but everyday speech uses se for people too. The register split explained.
- tämä, tuo or se?A2 — How to choose between Finnish's three demonstratives — tämä (near me), tuo (over there, pointable) and se (known or out of sight) — where English gets by with just this and that.
- The Here/There System: tässä, siinä, tuossaA2 — Finnish has a second here/there series built on the demonstratives tämä/se/tuo — tässä (this exact spot) versus täällä (this whole area).