Breakdown of Onko tämä loputon kuumuus tuskallista?
tämä
this
olla
to be
tuskallinen
agonizing
kuumuus
heat
loputon
endless
Questions & Answers about Onko tämä loputon kuumuus tuskallista?
Why is tuskallista in the partitive case instead of the nominative tuskallinen?
In Finnish, when you use the verb olla (to be) to describe an uncountable or abstract noun (like kuumuus, "heat"), the describing adjective must be in the partitive case. If the subject were a countable, concrete thing like a book (kirja), the adjective would take the nominative case.
I know the word for "hot" is kuuma. How does that become kuumuus?
The suffix -uus (or -yys) is used to turn an adjective into an abstract noun, much like adding "-ness" in English. So kuuma (hot) becomes kuumuus (heat or hotness).
The word loputon means "endless". How is this word built?
It comes from the noun loppu (end) plus the suffix -ton (or -tön), which means "without" (just like "-less" in English). Notice that adding this suffix triggers consonant gradation, which softens the strong double pp in loppu to a weak single p in loputon.
Since the current lesson is about time durations, why doesn't loputon (endless) trigger the accusative/total object rules for time?
Time duration rules only apply to phrases that act as adverbs telling you for how long an action happens (e.g., "I slept for an hour"). In this sentence, loputon is just a regular adjective describing the subject noun kuumuus (this endless heat). Because the subject is in the basic nominative case, the adjectives attached to it simply agree with it and also stay in the nominative.
Learn Onko tämä loputon kuumuus tuskallista and more in Finnish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free