Breakdown of Opettaja luulee maisterin suorittaneen kurssin.
opettaja
teacher
kurssi
course
luulla
to think, to suppose
maisteri
master
Questions & Answers about Opettaja luulee maisterin suorittaneen kurssin.
How does this sentence replace an että (that) clause?
This is the referative construction (partisiippirakenne). Instead of using a subclause like Opettaja luulee, että maisteri on suorittanut kurssin, the subject of the subclause (maisteri) changes to the genitive form maisterin. The past tense verb (on suorittanut) is then replaced by the past active participle suorittaneen.
How exactly is the word suorittaneen formed?
It comes from the verb suorittaa (to complete). For a past action in this construction, you need the active past participle. You take the plural past participle form suorittaneet, replace the final -t with -e-, and add the genitive ending -n to get suorittaneen. Using the past form shows that the completion happened before the thinking.
Why does the object kurssin end in -n? Does this construction change how objects work?
The construction doesn't change the object rules here. The word kurssin is in the singular accusative case, which looks identical to the genitive. Because the participle suorittaneen is active, it takes a standard total object ending in -n, exactly as it would in the basic sentence Maisteri on suorittanut kurssin.
Could I use this -neen structure with a verb like haluaa (wants) instead of luulee?