Historiallista maamerkkiä ei tuhottaisi sodan jälkeen.

Questions & Answers about Historiallista maamerkkiä ei tuhottaisi sodan jälkeen.

How is the negative passive conditional formed in ei tuhottaisi?
It uses the negative word ei plus the passive conditional form of tuhota (to destroy) but without the final -in. The affirmative form is tuhottaisiin (would be destroyed), so dropping the -in gives us the negative main verb tuhottaisi.
Why are historiallista maamerkkiä in the partitive case here?
Because this is a negative sentence. In Finnish, the object of a negative sentence is always in the partitive case. If the sentence were affirmative, the object of a passive verb would be in the nominative case: historiallinen maamerkki tuhottaisiin.
Why does tuhottaisi have a double tt when the basic verb is tuhota?
tuhota is a type 4 verb. When forming the passive conditional for type 4, 5, and 6 verbs, you use the strong passive marker -ttai- (or -ttäi-) attached to the stem. This is why the single t from the dictionary form becomes a double tt.
Why does the word sota (war) become sodan in this sentence?
The word jälkeen (after) is a postposition, and it requires the noun before it to be in the genitive case. Adding the genitive -n ending to sota also triggers consonant gradation, changing the strong t to a weak d.

Learn Historiallista maamerkkiä ei tuhottaisi sodan jälkeen and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free