Brandmanden har altid masken på når røgen er livsfarlig.

Questions & Answers about Brandmanden har altid masken på når røgen er livsfarlig.

Why is på at the very end of the main clause, separated from har?
The phrase for 'to wear' is at have på. In a main clause, the verb har takes the second position, but the small word (particle) på gets pushed after the object (masken). With the adverb altid stepping in right after the verb, we get the specific order: verb + adverb + object + particle.
The sentence uses når for 'when'. Could we use da here instead?
No, da is only used for a single, specific event in the past (like 'when the fire started yesterday'). Because this sentence describes a general, repeated truth, we must use når. A classic Danish rule to remember is that når is for present, future, and repeated past events.
Why does it say masken (the mask) instead of sin maske (his mask)?
While you could correctly say sin maske, Danish often prefers using just the definite article (like masken) for personal items, clothing, or body parts when it is completely obvious who the owner is. Since a firefighter naturally wears their own mask, masken is the most natural choice here.
How would this sentence look if we applied this lesson's grammar, uanset om (regardless of whether)?
To use uanset om, we would change the condition into something that doesn't change the outcome. For example: Brandmanden har altid masken på, uanset om røgen er livsfarlig eller ej (The firefighter always wears the mask, regardless of whether the smoke is life-threatening or not). Notice how this shifts the meaning from a strict condition to a concession!

Learn Brandmanden har altid masken på når røgen er livsfarlig and more in Danish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free