Conjunctions of reason (i og med at)

Given That: "i og med at"

To introduce a logical reason or justification in a complex argument, use the subordinating conjunction i og med at (in that / given that / inasmuch as).

The transition is difficult in that the climate crisis is complex.
Omstillingen er svær i og med at klimakrisen er kompleks.

It connects a supporting fact (the subordinate clause) to the main statement, and is especially useful when explaining causes and effects.

We reduce emissions in that we avoid fossil fuels.
Vi reducerer udslippet i og med at vi undgår fossile brændstoffer.

Discussing the Climate Transition

When debating the environment, use this conjunction to link sustainability initiatives with their impacts.

The woman claims that solar cells are crucial for the transition given that they are environmentally friendly.
Kvinden påstår at solceller er afgørende for omstillingen i og med at de er miljøvenlige.
Fossil fuels cause climate change in that they pollute the environment.
Fossile brændstoffer forårsager klimaforandringer i og med at de forurener miljøet.

You can also use it to weigh different solutions against each other.

The researcher believes that wind turbines are more efficient than solar cells given that it blows a lot.
Forskeren mener at vindmøller er mere effektive end solceller i og med at det blæser meget.

Word Order with "i og med at"

Because i og med at introduces a subordinate clause, placing it at the beginning of a sentence means that the entire clause occupies the first position. To satisfy the Danish V2 rule, the following main clause must invert its subject and verb.

Since climate change is serious, the politician supports the transition.
I og med at klimaforandringen er alvorlig, støtter politikeren omstillingen.