Saslušavši svjedoka, sudac je otišao kući.

Questions & Answers about Saslušavši svjedoka, sudac je otišao kući.

How is saslušavši formed in this sentence?
It comes from the perfective verb saslušati (to hear out). To form this past verbal adverb, you take the infinitive, drop the -ti, and add -vši. This ending creates a word that means having done something in English.
Could I use the imperfective verb slušati to make this adverb?
Generally no. The -vši ending is almost exclusively added to perfective verbs like saslušati. This is because the past verbal adverb describes an action that was completely finished before the main action (otišao) took place.
Who is the one listening to the witness in this sentence?
The judge (sudac). A strict rule for using past verbal adverbs like saslušavši is that the person performing that action must be the exact same person as the subject of the main verb (je otišao).
Why does svjedok end in -a here?
The word svjedoka is the direct object of the listening action, so it needs to be in the accusative case. Because svjedok (witness) is a living male being (an animate masculine noun), its accusative ending matches the genitive ending -a.
Why do we use kući to say the judge went home instead of u kuću?
While motion towards a destination usually takes a preposition like u or na plus the accusative case, going home is a common exception. The phrase ići kući (to go home) uses the bare dative case without any preposition.

Learn Saslušavši svjedoka, sudac je otišao kući and more in Croatian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free