انسحب الأمير خالد من المعاهدة.

Questions & Answers about انسحب الأمير خالد من المعاهدة.

How does the grammar work for "Prince Khaled" since there is no Idafa (possessive) structure?
This is the core of Apposition (البدل). When a definite title like الأمير (the Prince) is followed immediately by a proper name like خالد, the name is considered an apposition. It simply clarifies who the title refers to without needing an Idafa (which would mean "the Prince of Khaled").
Why doesn't the name خالد need the definite article ال to match الأمير?
Proper names of people, like خالد, are already inherently definite in Arabic. Therefore, it perfectly matches the definite title الأمير in definiteness, which is a requirement for this type of apposition.
What case ending does خالد take here, and why?
It takes a nominative case ending (damma) because an apposition always copies the grammatical case of the noun it clarifies. Since الأمير is the subject of the sentence doing the withdrawing, it is nominative. If the sentence were "I saw Prince Khaled", both the title and the name would change to the accusative case (taking a fatha).
What verb form is انسحب and how does it relate to its root?
It is a Form VII verb. The base root is س-ح-ب, which means to pull or drag. Form VII often makes a verb reflexive or passive. In this context, pulling oneself away translates naturally to withdrawing or retreating.

Learn انسحب الأمير خالد من المعاهدة and more in Arabic

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free