Desired-Outcome Clauses with agar and supaya

Agar and supaya introduce a desired outcome: a proposition that the matrix action, request, or policy is intended to make true. They are often translated as β€œso that” or β€œin order that,” but unlike an infinitive, their clause can state its own subject.

The central contrast with untuk is therefore not a word-for-word choice between English connectors. Agar/supaya package a wished-for proposition, especially when the actor changes. This page excludes basic order drills, individual affix formation, and pragmatic particle meanings.

The core desired-outcome pattern

Use:

matrix clause + agar/supaya + (embedded subject) + embedded predicate

Rina belajar tekun agar lulus ujian masuk universitas.

Rina studies hard so that she will pass the university entrance examination.

Saya minta supaya dia datang sebelum rapat dimulai.

I asked that he or she come before the meeting begins.

Kami berangkat lebih pagi agar tidak terlambat di bandara.

We left earlier so as not to be late at the airport.

The required patterns Belajar agar lulus, Saya minta supaya dia datang, and agar tidak terlambat show three possibilities: same understood actor, an explicit different actor, and a negated desired result.

πŸ’‘
Read agar/supaya as β€œwith the desired result that...” The following words describe a state of affairs someone wants to bring about, not an Indonesian infinitive.

Same-subject purpose

When the actor remains the same, agar/supaya can make the desired result more prominent than a simple untuk phrase.

Doni mencatat semua tenggat agar tidak melupakan satu pun tugas.

Doni records every deadline so that he will not forget any assignments.

Kami berlatih setiap sore supaya tampil lebih percaya diri.

We practice every afternoon so that we will perform more confidently.

Sari membawa bekal agar tidak perlu membeli makan siang.

Sari brings a packed meal so that she will not need to buy lunch.

Saya menyimpan salinannya supaya dapat membacanya lagi di rumah.

I saved a copy so that I could read it again at home.

The embedded subject is omitted because it is controlled by the matrix subject: Doni forgets, we perform, Sari buys, and I read. This resembles same-subject untuk, but agar/supaya frames a hoped-for consequence rather than merely naming the purpose action.

Saya datang untuk mengambil kartu peserta.

I came to collect the participant card.

Saya datang lebih awal agar kartu peserta dapat segera saya ambil.

I came early so that I could collect the participant card promptly.

The first names the errand compactly. The second presents prompt collection as the intended result of arriving early. The untuk-complement guide develops the controlled-action side of this contrast.

A different subject can be explicit

This is the clearest advantage of agar/supaya. The desired-outcome clause can name a participant different from the matrix actor.

Saya membuka jendela agar udara segar dapat masuk.

I opened the window so that fresh air could enter.

Guru berbicara pelan supaya semua siswa memahami petunjuknya.

The teacher spoke slowly so that all the students would understand the instructions.

Kami memindahkan kursi agar petugas kebersihan lebih mudah bekerja.

We moved the chairs so that the cleaning staff could work more easily.

Ayah menutup pagar supaya kucing itu tidak keluar ke jalan.

Dad closed the gate so that the cat would not go out into the street.

The matrix actors perform opening, speaking, moving, and closing; the embedded subjects undergo the desired result. No special subjunctive morphology appears. Indonesian relies on the connector and clause structure.

This differs from a potentially ambiguous untuk + noun + verb sequence:

Kami menyediakan meja untuk tamu menulis.

We provided a table for guests to write at; untuk tamu can initially look like a beneficiary phrase.

Kami menyediakan meja agar para tamu dapat menulis dengan nyaman.

We provided a table so that the guests could write comfortably.

The second makes para tamu unambiguously subject of dapat menulis.

Purpose versus requested or desired content

The matrix clause need not describe a physical action. Verbs of requesting, arranging, hoping, reminding, or requiring can select a desired proposition.

Direktur meminta agar laporan tersebut diperiksa kembali.

The director requested that the report be checked again. (formal)

Ibu meminta supaya kami menelepon setelah tiba.

Mother asked us to call after arriving.

Panitia mengingatkan peserta agar membawa kartu identitas.

The committee reminded participants to bring identification.

Dokter menyarankan agar pasien mengurangi makanan asin.

The doctor advised that the patient reduce salty foods.

Kami berharap supaya keadaan segera membaik.

We hope that the situation improves soon. (conversational)

Here the subordinate clause is not an action performed by the matrix subject. It is the state of affairs requested, advised, reminded about, or hoped for. Agar is especially common after formal institutional predicates; supaya is frequent in conversation.

Agar and supaya: register, not a hard semantic split

For most purpose and desired-result clauses, the two connectors are semantically close.

FormTypical profileExample setting
agarneutral-formal, compactinstructions, policy, edited prose
supayaneutral-conversationalspeech, family advice, everyday planning

Harap simpan bukti pembayaran agar permohonan dapat diproses.

Please retain proof of payment so that the application can be processed. (formal)

Simpan nomorku supaya kamu bisa menghubungiku nanti.

Save my number so that you can contact me later. (conversational)

Pemerintah menambah pasokan agar harga tetap stabil menjelang hari raya.

The government increased supplies so that prices would remain stable before the holiday. (formal)

Geser sedikit kursinya supaya orang bisa lewat.

Move the chair a little so that people can get through. (conversational)

This is a register tendency, not an absolute law. Supaya appears in careful prose, and agar occurs in speech. The choice should follow the genre and relationship rather than a supposed difference in truth conditions.

πŸ’‘
In an official instruction, agar is usually the safest stylistic default. In an everyday request between familiar speakers, supaya often sounds less institutional.

Negating the desired outcome

Place tidak before the predicate inside the subordinate clause.

Tutup rapat wadahnya agar air tidak tumpah.

Close the container tightly so that the water does not spill.

Saya menulis alamatnya supaya kurir tidak salah jalan.

I wrote down the address so that the courier would not take the wrong route.

Kami berbicara bergantian agar tidak saling memotong.

We spoke in turns so that we would not interrupt one another.

Petugas memasang pembatas supaya anak-anak tidak mendekati lubang itu.

The officers put up a barrier so that children would not approach the hole.

In same-subject examples, the actor can remain omitted after agar/supaya. With a different actor such as air, kurir, or anak-anak, state it.

Modals may appear within the desired proposition:

Materi disederhanakan agar pembaca dapat memahami inti pembahasannya.

The material was simplified so that readers could understand the main point.

Kami mengirim pengingat supaya peserta bisa menyiapkan dokumen lebih awal.

We sent a reminder so that participants could prepare their documents earlier.

Dapat suits formal exposition; bisa is neutral and conversational. The connector does not determine the modal automatically.

Clause position and comma use

When the desired-outcome clause follows the matrix clause, Indonesian normally uses no comma.

Saya menyalakan lampu teras agar tamu mudah menemukan rumah kami.

I turned on the porch light so that guests could easily find our house.

When it is placed first as a frame, use a comma before the main clause.

Agar tidak terlambat, kami memesan taksi sejak malam sebelumnya.

So as not to be late, we booked a taxi the night before.

Supaya semua orang mendapat tempat, panitia menambah dua baris kursi.

So that everyone would get a seat, the committee added two rows of chairs.

Do not copy an optional English comma before every final β€œso that” clause. Punctuation follows Indonesian clause position and information structure.

Common Mistakes

1. Using untuk despite an unclear actor change

❌ Saya membuka gerbang untuk mobil tamu masuk.

Awkwardly ambiguous β€” untuk mobil tamu can look like a nominal purpose or beneficiary phrase.

βœ… Saya membuka gerbang agar mobil para tamu dapat masuk.

I opened the gate so that the guests' cars could enter.

2. Doubling purpose markers

❌ Kami berangkat pagi untuk agar tidak terjebak macet.

Incorrect β€” one connector introduces the same purpose clause.

βœ… Kami berangkat pagi agar tidak terjebak kemacetan di pusat kota.

We left in the morning so that we would not get stuck in city-center traffic.

3. Omitting a different subordinate subject

❌ Guru mengulang penjelasannya supaya lebih memahami aturan.

Unclear β€” the grammar suggests the teacher will understand better, not the students.

βœ… Guru mengulang penjelasannya supaya para siswa lebih memahami aturan.

The teacher repeated the explanation so that the students would understand the rule better.

4. Putting negation before the connector

❌ Kami berangkat lebih awal tidak agar terlambat.

Incorrect order β€” negation belongs inside the desired-outcome clause.

βœ… Kami berangkat sangat pagi agar tidak terlambat mengikuti upacara.

We left very early so that we would not be late for the ceremony.

5. Adding an English-style comma before a final purpose clause

❌ Mereka menutup jalan, supaya petugas dapat bekerja dengan aman.

Incorrect neutral punctuation β€” a following purpose clause is not separated by a comma.

βœ… Mereka menutup jalan supaya petugas dapat bekerja dengan aman.

They closed the road so that the officers could work safely.

Key Takeaways

  • Agar and supaya introduce a desired proposition, not an infinitive.
  • Their clause can share the matrix actor or state a distinct subject explicitly.
  • Agar trends neutral-formal; supaya trends conversational, with substantial overlap.
  • Put tidak and modals inside the desired-outcome clause before its predicate.
  • A final purpose clause normally has no comma; a fronted one is followed by a comma.

Now practice Indonesian

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks β€” free, no signup needed.

Start learning Indonesian β†’

Related Topics

  • Action Complements with untukB1 β€” Use untuk to connect a prospective action to a purpose, selected predicate, evaluation, or nominal plan while tracking its understood actor.
  • agar, supaya, and untukA2 β€” Choose a purpose linker by deciding whether the intended action shares the main actor or forms a proposition with its own subject.
  • untuk: Beneficiary and PurposeA1 β€” Use untuk to mark intended beneficiaries, purposes, uses, and prospective goals.
  • Shared Subjects and ControlB2 β€” Track the understood subject of embedded actions after ingin, mau, mencoba, mulai, menyuruh, membiarkan, and related predicates.
  • tidak with Verbs and AdjectivesA1 β€” Use tidak before verbal and adjectival predicates, control its scope with modals and frequency words, and answer negative questions naturally.
  • Standard Formal Written IndonesianB1 β€” Write clear standard Indonesian with EYD V spelling, explicit relations, purposeful nominalization, stable reference, and controlled sentence length.