Wishing and regretting are, grammatically, the same act pointed in two directions: a wish reaches toward an unreal present or future ("if only I were taller"), a regret toward an unreal past ("if only I'd listened"). Dutch builds both on the irrealis — the past tense used to mark unreality, the same system that powers counterfactual conditionals — plus one tiny, load-bearing particle: maar ("just", "only"). Leave out the maar and a wish collapses into a flat statement of fact. This page is about getting the tense and that particle right, because together they are what make the difference between "I was richer" and the heartfelt "if only I were richer".
The inverted wish: 'Was ik maar...'
The most idiomatic Dutch wish inverts the verb to first position — like a conditional — and inserts maar. The shape is [finite past verb] + [subject] + maar + (rest). Because the situation is unreal in the present, the verb is in the simple past, even though you're talking about now.
Was ik maar rijker, dan kon ik stoppen met werken.
If only I were richer, then I could stop working. (present wish → past tense 'was')
Had ik maar meer tijd.
If only I had more time. (present wish about a present lack)
Kon ik maar zien wat jij ziet.
If only I could see what you see.
The inversion plus maar is doing all the wishing. Without maar, was ik rijker would just be a fragment of a conditional or a question. With it, the clause becomes a freestanding exclamation of longing. This construction is high-frequency, emotionally warm, and works in speech and writing alike.
The embedded wish: 'Ik wou dat...'
The other main wish frame is Ik wou dat... (literally "I wished that...") followed by a dat-clause with verb-final order. Despite the past-tense look of wou, this is the standard way to express a present wish — wou here is an irrealis form, not a report of past wishing. The colloquial wou is more common than the textbook-correct wilde in this construction; both are acceptable, wou is more idiomatic.
Ik wou dat ik kon vliegen.
I wish I could fly. ('wou' + dat-clause; verb 'kon' in the past, sent to the end)
Ik wou dat het al vakantie was.
I wish it were the holidays already.
Ze wou dat hij wat vaker langskwam.
She wishes he'd come by a bit more often.
The verb inside the dat-clause carries the irrealis: present wish → simple past (kon, was, langskwam); past wish/regret → pluperfect (had gedaan). Note that no maar is needed here, because Ik wou dat already supplies the wishing; maar is the partner of the inverted construction, not the embedded one.
Ik wou dat ik beter had opgelet.
I wish I'd paid better attention. (regret about the past → pluperfect 'had opgelet')
A more formal alternative is Ik wilde dat..., and the higher-register Ik wenste dat.... The verb wensen ("to wish") also gives the very formal, almost ceremonial Ik wens dat... — but as a present-day expression of personal longing it sounds stilted and over-formal; reserve it for set good wishes (Ik wens je het allerbeste) rather than counterfactual wishing.
Regret about the past: 'Had ik maar...'
To regret something that did or didn't happen, you reach for the pluperfect — had/was + participle — and, in the inverted construction, the same trusty maar.
Had ik maar geluisterd.
If only I'd listened. (regret → inverted pluperfect + 'maar')
Was ik maar eerder vertrokken.
If only I'd left earlier.
Hadden we het maar eerder geweten.
If only we'd known sooner.
This is the single most natural way to voice retrospective regret in Dutch. The verb fronts (had, was, hadden), the subject follows, maar slots in, and the participle closes the clause. Emotionally it lands harder than the embedded Ik wou dat ik geluisterd had, which is also correct but flatter.
'Ik had moeten...': the regret of obligation
A distinct and very common regret pattern uses had + moeten/kunnen/willen + infinitive to say what you should have, could have, or wanted to have done. This is the Dutch equivalent of English "I should have gone".
Ik had moeten gaan.
I should have gone. (regret about an unfulfilled obligation)
Je had het me eerder kunnen vertellen.
You could have told me earlier.
We hadden eerder moeten vertrekken.
We should have left earlier.
The structure is had (the finite auxiliary, in the pluperfect) + the main verb's infinitive + the modal as a bare infinitive — the famous infinitivus pro participio ("IPP"): you say had moeten gaan, never had gemoeten gaan. The modal that would normally appear as a participle (gemoeten) surfaces as an infinitive (moeten) because it is followed by another infinitive. This is one of the small irregularities of Dutch verb clusters worth memorising as a fixed pattern: had + [infinitive modal] + [infinitive].
Comparison with English
English wishes are built on "wish" + a backshifted clause ("I wish I were", "I wish I'd listened") and on the inverted "if only". Dutch lines up neatly but with three traps. First, Dutch needs maar in the inverted wish where English needs the words "only" ("if only") — drop maar and the wish evaporates, with no English-style fallback. Second, English "I wish" maps to Dutch Ik wou dat (idiomatic) far more than to Ik wens dat (over-formal); a learner who picks wens by dictionary-matching "wish" sounds oddly ceremonial. Third, "I should have gone" becomes Ik had moeten gaan with the IPP infinitive moeten — English speakers expect a past participle there and produce the impossible had gemoeten. As with all the irrealis, the governing instinct is the same: shift the tense one step back, and let that backshift carry the unreality.
Common Mistakes
❌ Was ik rijker, dan kon ik stoppen met werken.
Incorrect — without 'maar' this isn't a wish, just a bare conditional fragment. The wish needs the particle 'maar'.
✅ Was ik maar rijker, dan kon ik stoppen met werken.
If only I were richer, then I could stop working.
❌ Ik wou dat ik kan vliegen.
Incorrect — the wish is unreal, so the embedded verb takes the irrealis past 'kon', not the present 'kan'.
✅ Ik wou dat ik kon vliegen.
I wish I could fly.
❌ Ik wens dat ik beter had opgelet.
Incorrect — 'Ik wens dat' for a personal counterfactual wish is over-formal and stilted; use the idiomatic 'Ik wou dat'.
✅ Ik wou dat ik beter had opgelet.
I wish I'd paid better attention.
❌ Had ik maar luisterde.
Incorrect — a past regret uses the pluperfect (had + past participle), not a simple past form: 'had ... geluisterd'.
✅ Had ik maar geluisterd.
If only I'd listened.
❌ Ik had gemoeten gaan.
Incorrect — in the cluster, the modal surfaces as an infinitive (IPP), not a participle: 'had moeten gaan'.
✅ Ik had moeten gaan.
I should have gone.
Key Takeaways
- The inverted wish Was/Had/Kon + subject + maar... expresses longing; maar is the indispensable wish particle.
- Ik wou dat + verb-final is the everyday embedded wish; wou is more idiomatic than wilde, and Ik wens dat is over-formal.
- Tense carries the unreality: present wish → simple past; past wish/regret → pluperfect (had + participle).
- Had ik maar geluisterd is the most natural way to voice past regret.
- Ik had moeten gaan uses the IPP: had
- bare-infinitive modal (moeten) + infinitive — never had gemoeten.
Now practice Dutch
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Dutch→Related Topics
- Complex Grammar: OverviewB2 — An orientation to the Complex Grammar group — the constructions that combine several rules at once: anticipatory het and er pointing forward to clauses, reported speech with embedded word order, long verb clusters, stacked subordination, and the information-packaging that makes advanced Dutch sound natural. Where the pieces fit, and the one error that haunts all of them.
- Conditional Inversion and the IrrealisC1 — Dutch builds conditionals without 'als' by inverting the verb to first position — 'Had ik het geweten, dan was ik gekomen', 'Mocht je hem zien...', 'Ware het niet dat...' — and marks the unreal with a precise tense system: present counterfactual with the simple past, past counterfactual with 'had'/'zou hebben' + participle.
- The Conditional with Zou(den)B1 — Zou is the past of zullen and the engine of Dutch 'would' — present/future hypotheticals, reported future, softened opinions, and above all the politeness formula zou + willen/kunnen that turns a blunt request into a courteous one.
- Conditional and Concessive: Als, Tenzij, Hoewel, AlB1 — How Dutch builds 'if', 'unless', 'although' and 'even though' clauses — and why one of them, al, breaks the verb-final rule and forces inversion instead.