Once everyone knows what you're talking about, Chinese lets you drop the noun and keep just the Number + Measure Word: 我要一个 (wǒ yào yí ge) "I'll take one," 给我两张 (gěi wǒ liǎng zhāng) "give me two." The measure word already encodes what kind of thing it is, so it can stand alone as a placeholder — much as English "one" does in "give me two" or "I'll take the red one." This is one of the most natural, high-frequency patterns in everyday speech: in a shop, at a market, over a menu, you rarely repeat the noun once it's been established. The one iron rule is that the measure word stays — you may drop the noun, but never the classifier with it.
Number + Measure Word, noun understood
The core pattern is simple: whenever the noun is recoverable from context — because it's on the table, on the menu, or just been mentioned — you leave it out and let the measure word do the pointing.
——你要几个？——我要一个。
—nǐ yào jǐ ge? —wǒ yào yí ge
—How many do you want? —I'll take one. (informal) — 一个 stands alone; the item is already understood.
给我两张，谢谢。
gěi wǒ liǎng zhāng, xièxie
Give me two, thanks. (informal) — at a ticket window, 两张 needs no 票 after it.
——苹果还是橘子？——都要一个吧。
—píngguǒ háishi júzi? —dōu yào yí ge ba
—Apples or oranges? —Give me one of each. (informal) — 一个 twice-over, nouns dropped.
服务员，再来一瓶！
fúwùyuán, zài lái yì píng!
Waiter, another bottle! (informal) — 一瓶 alone; everyone knows it's the beer.
Demonstrative + Measure Word: 这个 / 那个 / 哪个
The same drop happens after demonstratives. 这个 (zhè ge), 那个 (nà ge) and 哪个 (nǎ ge) — literally "this/that/which + 个" — routinely stand alone as "this one / that one / which one," with no noun needed.
这个多少钱？
zhè ge duōshao qián?
How much is this one? (informal) — 这个 points at the item; no noun required.
我不要这个，要那个。
wǒ bú yào zhè ge, yào nà ge
I don't want this one, I want that one. (informal) — 这个 / 那个 contrasted, both noun-free.
这几个我都不喜欢，有别的吗？
zhè jǐ ge wǒ dōu bù xǐhuan, yǒu bié de ma?
I don't like any of these — do you have others? (informal) — 这几个, 'these (several),' noun understood.
Any specific measure word works here, not just 个: pointing at flat things you can say 这张 or 那张; at long-thin things, 这条. The measure word keeps matching the (unspoken) noun's category.
Choosing between 那个 and 红的 (the "de" alternative)
There are two ways to say "the red one": with the measure word (红的那个) or with a de-phrase alone (红的). The de-nominalization pattern — adjective + 的 — itself works as a stand-in noun, so you don't always need the measure word at all when a describing word is doing the identifying.
| Full form | Reduced form | English |
|---|---|---|
| 我要那个红色的苹果 | 我要红的 / 那个红的 | I want the red one |
| 给我那张大的地图 | 给我大的 / 那张大的 | give me the big one |
| 这本书是我的 | 这本是我的 | this one's mine |
红的那个更好看，我买红的。
hóng de nà ge gèng hǎokàn, wǒ mǎi hóng de
The red one looks better — I'll buy the red one. (informal) — 红的那个 with the MW, then 红的 alone.
大的给你，小的给我。
dà de gěi nǐ, xiǎo de gěi wǒ
The big one's for you, the small one's for me. (informal) — 大的 / 小的 stand alone via 的, no measure word.
Common Mistakes
1. Dropping the measure word along with the noun. You may drop the noun, but the number still needs its classifier. 我要一 is ungrammatical.
❌ 我要一。
Incorrect — a bare number can't stand alone; keep the measure word: 我要一个.
✅ 我要一个。
wǒ yào yí ge
I'll take one. — Number + 个, noun dropped.
2. Redundantly repeating the noun when it's obvious. Once the item is established, restating it sounds heavy and unnatural.
❌ ——你要苹果吗？——我要一个苹果。
Overexplicit — repeating 苹果 is clumsy; drop it: 我要一个.
✅ ——你要苹果吗？——我要一个。
—nǐ yào píngguǒ ma? —wǒ yào yí ge
—Do you want apples? —I'll take one. — noun dropped, 一个 alone.
3. Leaving out the measure word even with the noun present. Chinese needs a measure word between number and noun in the first place — see why measure words are obligatory.
❌ 给我两票。
Incorrect — number and noun need a measure word between them: 给我两张票 or just 给我两张.
✅ 给我两张。
gěi wǒ liǎng zhāng
Give me two. — 两张, noun 票 understood and dropped.
4. Using 二 instead of 两 in the reduced phrase. "Two" before a measure word is 两, even when the noun is gone.
❌ 我要二个。
Incorrect — before a measure word 'two' is 两: 我要两个.
✅ 我要两个。
wǒ yào liǎng ge
I'll take two. — 两个, not 二个.
Key Takeaways
- When the noun is clear from context, drop it and keep Number + Measure Word: 我要一个, 给我两张, 再来一瓶.
- The measure word carries the classifying information, so it stands in for the noun — like English "one" in "give me two."
- Demonstratives do the same: 这个 / 那个 / 哪个 = "this one / that one / which one," noun understood.
- For "the _ one," a de-phrase can stand alone (红的, 大的) or pair with a measure word (那个红的).
- Never drop the measure word too — 我要一 is wrong; it must be 我要一个. And use 两, not 二.
Now practice Chinese
Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.
Start learning Chinese→Related Topics
- The Default 个HSK 1 — 个 (gè, usually neutral-toned ge) is the general-purpose measure word — the safe fallback when you don't know the specific classifier — and it correctly covers people, many everyday objects, and abstract nouns; the goal is to graduate to specific classifiers while keeping 个 for the nouns that genuinely take it.
- The 的 Nominalizer (卖菜的)HSK 3 — Attach 的 (de) to a modifier and leave off the noun, and the 的-phrase itself becomes a noun meaning 'the one(s) that …': 红的 (hóng de, 'the red one'), 卖菜的 (mài cài de, 'the greengrocer / the one who sells vegetables'), 我买的 (wǒ mǎi de, 'the one I bought'), 大的还是小的 (dà de háishì xiǎo de, 'the big one or the small one') — where English needs the pronoun 'one' or a relative clause, Chinese just lets 的 dangle and lets context supply the missing noun.
- Why Classifiers Are ObligatoryHSK 1 — Whenever you count a noun or point at it, Chinese demands a measure word between the number/demonstrative and the noun — 三本书, not 三书 — because a bare Chinese noun names a kind of thing, not a countable unit, so a classifier is what packages it into countable units.
- Choosing the Right ClassifierHSK 2 — A decision procedure for picking the right Chinese measure word: default to 个 when stuck, otherwise match the noun by shape, category, or the respect it deserves — plus a reference table of the ~15 classifiers that cover most everyday nouns.