Sentence Adverbs

A sentence adverb evaluates a whole proposition rather than the manner of one action. Potser estimates possibility, segurament expresses a strong expectation, evidentment presents a conclusion as obvious, francament frames the speaker's act as candid, and per sort evaluates the situation as fortunate. These small expressions reveal how the speaker knows, judges, or commits to what follows.

That wide scope explains their mobility and their punctuation. It also explains why a literal English equivalent is unreliable: “surely,” “obviously,” and “frankly” do not divide probability, evidence, and conversational stance in exactly the same way as Catalan.

Decide what kind of stance you mean

Speaker's contributionUsual adverbialMood tendencyTypical punctuation
possibility, no firm commitmentpotsernormally indicativeusually integrated, often no comma
strong probability or inferenceseguramentindicativeintegrated or parenthetical
claim treated as evidentevidentmentindicative in a direct assertionoften followed by a comma when initial
candid comment on the speech actfrancamentdetermined by the clausenormally comma-separated at sentence level
positive evaluation of the outcomeper sortdetermined by the clauseoften detached by a comma

The “mood tendency” column is not a magical property of the adverb. It describes the construction that normally follows. Compare potser vindrà with és possible que vingui: the second expression contains a subordinate que-clause selected by an impersonal evaluation, so it takes the subjunctive.

Potser is one word and normally takes the indicative

The adverb potser means “perhaps, maybe.” It is written as one word and normally combines directly with an indicative clause in contemporary Catalan.

Potser demà tindrem una resposta del propietari.

Maybe tomorrow we'll have an answer from the landlord.

La Jana potser ja ha sortit; el seu abric no és al penjador.

Jana may already have left; her coat isn't on the rack.

The position can tune scope. Clause-initial Potser demà... presents the whole proposition as possible, with demà salient. La Jana potser ja ha sortit places the uncertainty inside a discourse topic already established as la Jana. Neither order changes potser into a manner adverb.

The separately written sequence pot ser is the verb poder plus ser: Això pot ser útil “That can be useful.” With a subordinate clause, pot ser que normally takes the subjunctive.

Pot ser que la reunió s'acabi cap a les quatre.

The meeting may end at around four.

(regional: parts of the Principat) The fixed expression potser que + subjunctive can soften a suggestion, instruction, or prohibition: Potser que ho deixem per demà. This is distinct from the probability predicate pot ser que, which can be paraphrased as “it may be that.”

This gives a useful minimal pair:

Potser la reunió s'acabarà abans de les cinc.

Perhaps the meeting will end before five. — Adverb potser plus indicative.

Pot ser que la reunió s'acabi abans de les cinc.

The meeting may end before five. — Verbal expression pot ser que plus subjunctive.

Spanish permits quizá with either indicative or subjunctive depending on stance. Do not preserve that government mechanically by writing potser vingui as the neutral Catalan pattern. Use potser ve/vindrà or recast as pot ser que vingui. Bare potser with the subjunctive also occurs in some Valencian and Tortosí speech, but it is not the pan-regional formal baseline.

💡
The space predicts the syntax: potser + indicative clause; pot ser que + subjunctive clause. The meanings overlap, but the grammatical structures do not.

Segurament is probable, not logically guaranteed

Segurament usually means “probably, most likely.” Despite its connection with segur, it need not express absolute certainty. A categorical claim is better expressed by the unqualified indicative or by sens dubte “without a doubt.”

Segurament arribarem després de sopar, perquè hi ha retencions a l'autopista.

We'll probably arrive after dinner because there are traffic jams on the motorway.

Els paquets que falten segurament són encara al magatzem.

The missing parcels are probably still in the warehouse.

The second sentence contains an embedded relative clause, que falten, inside the subject. Segurament evaluates the main proposition són encara al magatzem; it does not mean that the parcels are missing “in a probable manner.”

Negation normally falls inside the probability estimate when it follows the adverb: Segurament no vindrà means that non-arrival is probable. No vindrà segurament is possible with suitable intonation, but the final adverb can sound like a parenthetical afterthought; the first order is clearer in writing.

Segurament no ens contestaran avui, però podem insistir-hi dilluns.

They probably won't answer us today, but we can follow it up on Monday.

Do not confuse this with No és segur que ens contestin avui, which suspends certainty and selects a subjunctive subordinate clause. Small changes in scope and clause structure produce different mood choices.

Evidentment invokes shared or presented evidence

Evidentment marks the proposition as obvious from facts, reasoning, or shared knowledge. It can organize an argument, but overuse may sound dismissive: calling something evident also implies that a reasonable listener should recognize it.

Evidentment, no podem aprovar el pressupost sense veure'n les xifres detallades.

Obviously, we can't approve the budget without seeing its detailed figures.

La sala era buida i els llums estaven apagats; el concert, evidentment, ja s'havia acabat.

The hall was empty and the lights were off; the concert had obviously already ended.

Initial and medial detached positions take commas because evidentment is a parenthetical comment on the proposition. When tightly integrated and spoken without a pause, punctuation need not be forced mechanically. (academic) In argumentation, com és evident or a specific evidential basis is sometimes preferable to repeated evidentment.

💡
A comma is a scope clue, not an automatic decoration. Detached Francament, and Evidentment, usually comment on the whole assertion; an integrated adverb beside the verb is more likely to describe the event itself.

Francament: speech-act stance versus manner

Sentence-level francament tells the listener that the speaker is being candid. Manner francament describes how someone spoke or answered. Punctuation and position distinguish the readings.

Francament, no crec que aquesta reforma resolgui el problema de fons.

Frankly, I don't think this reform solves the underlying problem.

La portaveu va respondre francament a totes les preguntes dels periodistes.

The spokesperson answered all the journalists' questions frankly.

This is a true scope contrast. In the first sentence, francament modifies the present act of saying no crec...; in the second, it modifies the past answering event. English uses “frankly” for both and often relies on a pause. Catalan makes the same distinction, but comma placement gives the reader a strong cue.

The subjunctive resolgui comes from negated no crec que, not from francament. Sentence adverbs do not override the mood licensed inside an embedded clause.

Per sort evaluates the outcome

Per sort means “fortunately, luckily.” It is a prepositional adverbial, not a selected complement of the verb. It commonly occupies an initial, final, or parenthetical position and is often separated by a comma.

Per sort, una veïna guardava una còpia de les claus.

Fortunately, a neighbor had a spare copy of the keys.

El tren va sortir amb vint minuts de retard, però vam arribar a l'enllaç, per sort.

The train left twenty minutes late, but fortunately we made the connection.

The negative counterpart is per desgràcia “unfortunately.” Do not copy Spanish por suerte as por sort: Catalan uses per in this expression. See per versus per a for the broader contrast.

Order with clitics and other adverbs

Sentence adverbs may precede a clitic group, but nothing may split the weak pronouns from the finite verb: potser l'hi enviarem, not l'potser hi enviarem. When several adverbials occur, wide-scope stance tends to come before narrower time, place, or manner information.

Per sort, demà els podrem atendre amb més calma al despatx nou.

Fortunately, tomorrow we'll be able to assist them more calmly in the new office.

The layers are: speaker evaluation (per sort) > time (demà) > manner (amb més calma) > place (al despatx nou). Other orders are possible for focus, but they change what the sentence foregrounds. Catalan does not merely copy a fixed English adverb order.

Natural dialogue

—Creus que acceptaran la proposta? —Potser. Segurament ens demanaran algun canvi, però, francament, el text ja és prou clar. —I el termini? —Per sort, encara tenim una setmana. —Evidentment, doncs, val més revisar-lo una vegada més.

Do you think they'll accept the proposal? —Maybe. They'll probably ask us for a change, but frankly, the text is already clear enough. —And the deadline? —Fortunately, we still have a week. —Obviously, then, we'd better review it once more.

The dialogue moves from weak probability to stronger expectation, candid evaluation, good fortune, and a conclusion presented as evident. Those are distinct discourse jobs, not stylistic synonyms.

Common Mistakes

1. Using the subjunctive directly after potser.

⚠️ Potser arribin després que hàgim tancat.

Regional spoken usage; bare potser normally takes the indicative in pan-regional standard writing.

✅ Potser arribaran després que hàgim tancat.

Perhaps they'll arrive after we've already closed.

2. Confusing potser with pot ser.

❌ Aquest soroll potser el motor.

Incorrect—the meaning is 'can be the engine,' so a finite form of ser is required.

✅ Aquest soroll pot ser el motor de la nevera.

That noise could be the refrigerator motor.

3. Copying the Spanish preposition in per sort.

❌ Por sort, ningú no va prendre mal.

Incorrect—por is Spanish here.

✅ Per sort, ningú no va prendre mal durant la tempesta.

Fortunately, nobody was hurt during the storm.

4. Missing the sentence-level comma and changing the reading.

❌ Francament va explicar que no hi estava d'acord.

Without the intended pause, this tends toward 'he explained it frankly,' not 'frankly, he explained…'.

✅ Francament, va explicar massa tard que no hi estava d'acord.

Frankly, he explained too late that he disagreed.

Short correction task

Repair the mood and spelling in Pot ser vindrà and Potser vingui: write Potser vindrà or Pot ser que vingui. Then make the stance reading explicit in Francament va contestar que no: Francament, va contestar que no means “Frankly, she said no,” whereas Va contestar francament que no describes her manner of answering.

Key Takeaways

Use potser with an indicative proposition, but pot ser que with a subjunctive clause. Treat segurament as strong probability, evidentment as an appeal to evident grounds, francament as either speech-act stance or manner depending on scope, and per sort as an evaluation of the outcome. Position and commas are meaning-bearing cues, not decoration.

Now practice Catalan

Reading grammar gets you part of the way. The exercises are where it sticks — free, no signup needed.

Start learning Catalan →

Related Topics

  • Focus AdverbsB1 — Place només, també, fins i tot, sobretot, and precisament so that Catalan clearly identifies what is included, added, or contrasted.
  • Ordering Multiple AdverbialsC1 — Order Catalan viewpoint, time, place, manner, and focus adverbials by scope, weight, and information structure rather than by a rigid template.
  • Expressing Certainty and DoubtB1 — Calibrate certainty, inference, and doubt in Catalan with segur, potser, deure, em sembla, and mood choice.
  • Evidentiality without a Dedicated MoodC1 — How Catalan marks inference, appearance, hearsay, and source attribution without a grammatical evidential mood.
  • Epistemic, Deontic, and Dynamic ModalityC1 — How Catalan distinguishes probability, obligation, permission, willingness, and ability through modal verbs and related constructions.
  • Subjunctive after Doubt, Denial, and RejectionB1 — Choose the subjunctive when a speaker withholds commitment to a proposition through doubt, denial, or rejection.