Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Swedish grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Ingen dödades i olyckan.
Why is the s-passive dödades used here instead of the bli-passive blev dödad?
Both mean "was killed," but the s-passive (dödades) is standard for objective statements and news reporting. The bli-passive (blev dödad) tends to focus more on the suddenness of the event or the victim's personal experience, making it sound less neutral in a standard report.
I often see the verb omkomma in Swedish news. Could I use that instead of dödades?
Yes, Ingen omkom i olyckan is an excellent and very natural alternative. The verb omkomma specifically means to perish or lose one's life in an accident or disaster, whereas dödas is broader and can also apply to murders or warfare.
Could I just use the active verb dog and say Ingen dog i olyckan?
You can, and it means exactly "Nobody died in the accident." However, in formal Swedish or journalistic contexts, dödades (was killed) or omkom (perished) are heavily preferred over dog (died) when describing fatal accidents.
Why do we use Ingen here rather than Inget?
When used on its own to mean "nobody" or "no one," Swedish always defaults to the common gender form ingen because it refers to people. You only use inget as a standalone pronoun when it means "nothing."