Breakdown of Трюк на сцене — это далеко не магия.
это
this / it is
не
not
на
on, at / by (transport) / to (a place) / to (in answer to)
далеко
far, far away
Questions & Answers about Трюк на сцене — это далеко не магия.
How does далеко не change the meaning compared to just saying не магия?
Adding далеко (literally far) makes the negation emphatic. While не магия simply states a fact, далеко не магия (far from magic) actively pushes back against an assumption, emphasizing a massive gap between reality and the expectation.
Could I use вовсе не or отнюдь не in this sentence instead?
Yes, both work perfectly here. Вовсе не магия and отнюдь не магия both mean not magic at all. Далеко не is just slightly more visual, implying the trick is a long way from being actual magic, but the overall emphatic effect is identical.
Why is магия in the nominative case here instead of the genitive, since there is a negation?
We only use the genitive for negation when we are expressing the absence or non-existence of something. Here, we are equating one thing to another (a trick is not magic). The negation не simply reverses the equivalence, so магия stays in the nominative case as the predicate.
Is трюк the usual word for a magic trick?
Actually, a traditional magic trick or illusion is usually called a фокус. The word трюк is broader and often means a stunt or a clever physical feat. Using трюк here implies the performer is doing something physically impressive or technical, which is why the speaker emphasizes it is not real magic.