Questions & Answers about Síminn skemmist oft.
How does the -st ending change the meaning of the verb here?
The active verb is skemma, which means "to damage" or "to ruin" (for example, if someone drops a phone). Adding the -st ending to make it skemmist changes it to a passive or spontaneous action meaning "gets damaged." We use this because we are talking about what happens to the phone, without focusing on who or what is breaking it.
Why is Síminn in the nominative case if it is the thing receiving the damage?
In an active sentence (like "I damaged the phone"), the phone would be the object and take the accusative case (símann). However, when we use an -st verb for a passive action, the thing receiving the action becomes the grammatical subject of the sentence. Therefore, Síminn must be in the nominative case.
Could I say Síminn er skemmdur oft instead of using the -st verb?
No, that would sound quite unnatural. Er skemmdur (is damaged) describes a static condition or state, acting like an adjective. Because the sentence includes oft (often), we are describing a recurring event where the phone gets damaged over and over, so the dynamic action of the -st verb skemmist is required.
Just to refresh, why does Síminn have a double N at the end?
The base word is sími (phone), which is a weak masculine noun. To make it definite ("the phone") in the nominative case, you add the masculine article suffix -nn, resulting in síminn.
Learn Síminn skemmist oft and more in Icelandic
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free