Senin soru sorman konuşmayı canlandırdı.

Your asking a question livened up the talk.

Breakdown of Senin soru sorman konuşmayı canlandırdı.

• senin: your
• konuşma: the talk
• canlandırmak: to liven up
• soru: the question
• sormak: to ask

Questions & Answers about Senin soru sorman konuşmayı canlandırdı.

What is going on with the structure Senin soru sorman?

It’s a nominalized clause: the verb sor- is turned into a verbal noun with -ma, and its “subject” is marked in the genitive. So:

• senin = you (genitive, “your”)
• sor-ma-n = your asking (sor- + -ma verbal noun + -n 2sg possessive) The whole phrase Senin soru sorman functions as a single noun phrase meaning “your asking a question,” and it is the grammatical subject of the sentence.

Why is it senin, not sen?

With -ma/-me nominalizations, the doer of the action takes genitive case. So you need senin (genitive) rather than sen (nominative). Compare:

• Finite clause subject: Sen soru sordun. (You asked a question.)
• Nominalized subject: Senin soru sorman … (Your asking a question …)

How is sorman formed morphologically?

• sor- (verb root “ask”)
• -ma (verbal noun/gerund suffix)
• -n (2nd person singular possessive) Result: sor-ma-n = “your asking.”
  Other persons follow the same pattern: gel-mem (my coming), gel-men (your coming), onun gel-me-si (his/her coming).

Can I drop senin and just say Soru sorman konuşmayı canlandırdı?

Yes. The possessive ending -n on sorman already encodes “your,” so senin is optional. Keeping senin adds clarity or emphasis; omitting it is common when context makes the subject obvious.

Why do we say soru sorman instead of just sorman?

• soru sormak is a very common collocation meaning “to ask a question.”
• sorman alone means “your asking,” and often works fine, especially with an object like bana (e.g., Bana sorman = “your asking me”).
  Adding soru makes it crystal clear you mean a question (not, say, asking permission, directions, etc.).

Why not simply say Sen soru sordun?

Sen soru sordun is a complete finite sentence (“You asked a question.”). To express the causal/result relationship in one sentence, Turkish prefers a nominalized subject: Senin soru sorman konuşmayı canlandırdı (“Your asking a question revived the conversation”).
If you use the finite form, you typically need a second clause: Sen soru sordun ve konuşma canlandı or Sen soru sordun; bu konuşmayı canlandırdı.

Why is konuşmayı in the accusative? What’s the role of the buffer -y-?

• konuşma is “conversation.” As the definite/specific direct object of canlandırdı, it takes accusative: konuşma-ı → konuşmayı (4-way harmony gives -ı, and the buffer -y- is inserted to avoid vowel-vowel contact).
• Without accusative (konuşma), it would read as an indefinite/non-specific object, which doesn’t fit well here because a particular conversation is meant.

Who is the subject of canlandırdı, and why is it third-person past?

The subject is the entire nominalized phrase Senin soru sorman. Nominalized clauses behave like third-person singular nouns, so the verb appears in third-person past: canlandırdı (“[it] revived”). There’s no overt subject agreement suffix for 3sg in the past; -dı/-di/-du/-dü marks the past tense.

What’s the difference between canlandırmak and canlanmak?

• canlandırmak is transitive (“to enliven/bring to life”): [X] konuşmayı canlandırdı (X enlivened the conversation).
• canlanmak is intransitive (“to liven up”): Konuşma canlandı (The conversation livened up).
  You can say: Sen soru sordun ve konuşma canlandı, or keep the original causative with canlandırdı.

Can I change the word order?

Yes, Turkish allows flexible order for emphasis, while keeping the finite verb typically at the end:

• Neutral: Senin soru sorman konuşmayı canlandırdı.
• Object focus: Konuşmayı senin soru sorman canlandırdı. Placing the object after the verb (… canlandırdı konuşmayı) is possible in speech but marked; stick to SOV for clarity.

How do I make this negative or change the tense?

• Negative of the nominalized subject: sor-ma-ma-n → sormaman (“your not asking”). Note the double -ma: one for negation, one for nominalization.
• Negative main verb: canlandırmadı.
  Example: Senin soru sormaman konuşmayı canlandırmadı.
  Future: canlandıracak → Senin soru sorman konuşmayı canlandıracak.

How do I say it with polite/plural “you” or with third person?

• Polite/plural “you”: Sizin soru sormanız konuşmayı canlandırdı.
• Third person: Onun soru sorması konuşmayı canlandırdı.
  The possessive on the nominalized verb changes with the person: -m (1sg), -n (2sg), -sı/si/su/sü (3sg), -mız/miz (1pl), -nız/niz (2pl), -ları/leri (3pl).

I often confuse soru and sorun. Which one is here, and what’s the difference?

Here it’s soru (“question”).

• soru = question
• sorun = problem/issue
  So soru sormak = to ask a question; sorun would change the meaning entirely.