Sotelemek, yiyeceklerin lezzetini ortaya çıkarır.

Sautéing brings out the flavor of foods.

Breakdown of Sotelemek, yiyeceklerin lezzetini ortaya çıkarır.

• lezzet: the flavor
• yiyecek: the food
• sotelemek: to sauté
• ortaya çıkarmak: to bring out

Questions & Answers about Sotelemek, yiyeceklerin lezzetini ortaya çıkarır.

What does sotelemek mean, and how is it formed?

sotelemek is the infinitive “to sauté.” It’s built from the borrowed stem sote (from French sauté) plus the Turkish infinitive suffix -mek. In Turkish, dictionary-form verbs always end in -mek/-mak, and that same form can act like a gerund (a noun) when you need a subject or object.

Why is the suffix -mek used here, and not -ma/-me or -mak?

• -mek/-mak is the infinitive marker (“to do X”).
• -ma/-me is a noun-forming suffix (“the act of X”).
• We use -mek (not -mak) because of vowel harmony: the last vowel in sote is e (front unrounded), so the infinitive takes the front-vowel form -mek.

Could we say sote etmek or sote yapmak instead of sotelemek?

• sotelemek is the standard, dictionary form.
• sote etmek sometimes appears colloquially (using the general verb etmek), but it’s less “correct.”
• sote yapmak (“to do sauté”) is understandable in everyday speech but still uncommon; most cooks and recipes use sotelemek.

How do you break down yiyeceklerin? What are its suffixes?

yiyeceklerin = yiyecek (food) + -ler (plural) + -in (genitive)
This means “of the foods” and marks yiyeceklerin as the possessor in a genitive-possessive construction.

Why does lezzet carry -ini in lezzetini? Is that an object marker or a possessive?

The -i in lezzetini serves two jobs at once:
1) Third-person singular possessive (the flavor belongs to the foods).
2) Accusative case (marks the noun as a definite direct object of ortaya çıkarır).
Turkish often merges possession and definiteness marking into one -i suffix.

Why is lezzet singular rather than lezzetler (“flavors”)?

Here we refer to the general concept of flavor (an uncountable quality), so it stays singular. If you meant specific distinct flavors, you’d say farklı lezzetler (“different flavors”).

What does ortaya çıkarmak mean, and how does it function?

ortaya çıkarmak is a compound/derived verb:

• ortaya = “to/toward the surface” (a directional adverb)
• çıkarmak = causative form of çıkmak (“to go out”), so “to make go out”
  Together they mean “to bring out,” “to reveal,” or “to make emerge.” In cooking it’s used metaphorically: “to bring out the flavor.”

Why is the verb çıkarır in the aorist (simple present) tense?

Turkish uses the aorist (-r/-ar/-er) for general truths and habitual facts—just like English uses the simple present (“brings out”). That’s why we have çıkarır (3rd person singular aorist of ortaya çıkarmak) instead of a continuous or past tense.

What’s the purpose of the comma after sotelemek? Is it mandatory?

The comma separates the non-finite subject phrase (sotelemek acting as the “noun”) from the main clause. It’s not strictly mandatory in very casual writing, but it clarifies that “to sauté” is the topic/subject before you state what it does.

How would you turn this into a yes/no question—“Does sautéing bring out the flavor of foods?”

Add the question particle mı (harmonized as mı) right after the verb. The sentence becomes:
Sotelemek, yiyeceklerin lezzetini ortaya çıkarır mı?