Mission—Team—FAQ—Privacy—Terms—Sponsors—Grammar—Typing Course—Donate

© 2026 Elon Automation B.V.

Learn Hardcore Turkish: Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız. - We should stay away from danger.

Hardcore Turkish
/Preparing a patent application
/Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız.

Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız.

Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız.

We should stay away from danger.

Breakdown of Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız.

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Turkish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Turkish now

Questions & Answers about Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız.

Why does tehlike become tehlikeden?

Because -den / -dan is the ablative case suffix, which often means from or away from.

tehlike = danger
tehlikeden = from danger / away from danger

In this sentence, Turkish uses the ablative because the expression uzak durmak normally takes what you avoid in the ablative:

ateşten uzak durmak = to keep away from fire
kalabalıktan uzak durmak = to keep away from the crowd

Here it is -den rather than -dan because of vowel harmony: the last vowel in tehlike is e, so the front-vowel form -den is used.

What does uzak durmak mean exactly?

Uzak durmak is a very common Turkish expression meaning:

to stay away
to keep away
to keep one’s distance

Literally, the parts are:

uzak = far, distant
durmak = to stand, stop, stay

But together, uzak durmak works as a set expression. So in this sentence, don’t translate it too mechanically as stand far. The natural meaning is stay/keep away.

How is durmalıyız built?

durmalıyız breaks down like this:

dur- = stay / stand
-malı / -meli = should, must, ought to
-yız / -yiz / -yuz / -yüz = we

So:

durmalıyız = we should stay / we must stay

The -malı form is chosen because of vowel harmony. The extra y is a buffer consonant between vowels.

So the structure is basically:

dur + malı + yız → durmalıyız

Does durmalıyız mean we should or we must?

It can mean either, depending on context.

The suffix -malı / -meli expresses necessity or obligation, so it can be translated as:

should
must
ought to
need to (in some contexts)

In a sentence about safety like Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız, English might use either:

We should stay away from danger
We must keep away from danger

So the Turkish form itself does not always force one exact English modal. Context decides how strong it feels.

Why isn’t biz used? Doesn’t the sentence need a word for we?

No, Turkish usually does not need an explicit subject pronoun if the verb already shows the person.

Here, -yız already tells you the subject is we.

So:

Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız = We should stay away from danger

You could add biz for emphasis:

Biz tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız.

That would sound more like:

We should stay away from danger.

But in normal Turkish, leaving out biz is completely natural.

What is the normal word order here?

The word order is very natural for Turkish:

Tehlikeden = from danger
uzak durmalıyız = we should stay away

Turkish often places the verb at the end, and things like objects, complements, or adverbial phrases usually come before it.

So Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız is the standard, neutral order.

You might hear other orders in special contexts for emphasis, but this version is the most straightforward and natural for a learner.

Is there a literal word-for-word way to understand the sentence?

Yes. A very literal breakdown would be:

Tehlikeden = from danger
uzak = far / away
durmalıyız = we should stay

So, very literally:

From danger, away, we should stay.

That is not good natural English, but it helps show how Turkish is structured.

The natural English meaning is:

We should stay away from danger.
We must keep away from danger.

Why is it uzak durmak, not something like uzakta durmak?

Good question. Both uzak and uzakta relate to distance, but they work differently.

uzak = far / distant
uzakta = far away, in a distant place

The expression uzak durmak is the standard idiomatic phrase meaning to keep away.

So:

tehlikeden uzak durmak = to keep away from danger

If you used uzakta durmak, it would sound more like to stand/stay in a far-away place, which is not the normal expression here.

So for avoidance or keeping your distance, learn uzak durmak as a fixed phrase.

How would this sentence change if the subject were singular instead of we?

Only the personal ending changes.

Examples:

Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyım. = I should stay away from danger.
Tehlikeden uzak durmalısın. = You should stay away from danger.
Tehlikeden uzak durmalı. = He/She should stay away from danger.
Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız. = We should stay away from danger.
Tehlikeden uzak durmalısınız. = You should stay away from danger. / You all should stay away from danger.
Tehlikeden uzak durmalılar. = They should stay away from danger.

So the core meaning stays the same; only the ending shows who the subject is.

How would I negate this sentence?

You negate durmak with -ma / -me, then add the necessity ending.

So:

durmak = to stay
durmamak = not to stay
durmamalıyız = we should not stay

That gives:

Tehlikeden uzak durmamalıyız.

But be careful: this literally means:

We should not stay away from danger

That is the opposite idea, and it sounds odd in most situations.

So grammatically it is correct, but semantically it is unusual. If you want the original safety meaning, the positive sentence is the natural one:

Tehlikeden uzak durmalıyız.

Your questions are stored by us to improve Elon.io