Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Swedish grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Får man låna böcker här?
What does man mean here? Is it the word for a male person?
In this construction, man is an impersonal pronoun meaning one/you/people in general. It does not refer to a male. It’s used to talk about what is generally allowed or done.
Why use får instead of kan?
Får asks about permission (may). Kan asks about possibility/ability (can). Both can appear in real life, but:
- Får man låna böcker här? = Is it permitted?
- Kan man låna böcker här? = Is it possible; do you offer that service?
Is får the same word as the animal sheep?
Yes, the spelling is the same (får), and both are pronounced the same. Context shows which is meant. Here it’s the verb få in the present tense.
Why is the verb first (Får man ...)?
Yes/no questions in Swedish begin with the verb, then the subject: Verb–Subject–(inte/adverbs)–Object–Place/Time. Hence Får man låna böcker här?
Why is it låna and not lånar?
After modal verbs like får, Swedish uses the infinitive without att: får + låna. The present-tense lånar would be used in statements without a modal.
Do I need att before låna?
No. With modals (får, kan, ska, måste, bör, vill), you use the bare infinitive: får låna, not får att låna.
Does låna mean both borrow and lend?
- Borrow: låna (Jag vill låna en bok.)
- Lend: preferred is låna ut (Kan du låna ut din penna?) You will hear plain låna used for lend in speech, but låna ut is unambiguous and stylistically safe.
What is the plural böcker from? Why not boker?
It’s an irregular plural of bok. Vowel change (umlaut) + -er:
- Singular: en bok
- Definite singular: boken
- Plural: böcker
- Definite plural: böckerna
Why is it indefinite plural (böcker) and not definite (böckerna)?
You mean books in general, not specific ones. Definite plural (böckerna) would refer to particular books already known from context.
Why is här at the end?
Place adverbials like här normally come after the object in neutral order. Fronting här changes the feel:
- Neutral question: Får man låna böcker här?
- Statement/confirmation: Här får man låna böcker.
How would you answer this question in Swedish?
Common replies:
- Yes: Ja, det går bra. / Ja, det får man. / Ja, visst.
- No: Nej, tyvärr. / Nej, det får man inte.
Where does inte go for the negative?
In a statement: Här får man inte låna böcker. In a question the negation follows the subject: Får man inte låna böcker här?
Can I replace man with jag, du, or vi?
Yes, to be more personal:
- Får jag låna böcker här? (I)
- Får vi låna böcker här? (we)
- Kan jag få låna en bok? is extra polite.
What are some even politer or softer ways to ask?
- Skulle jag kunna få låna en bok?
- Skulle man kunna låna böcker här?
- Går det att låna böcker här?
Pronunciation tips?
- får [foːr] (å = long o)
- man [man]
- låna [ˈloːna]
- böcker [ˈbœkːɛr] (ö like French eu; double k is long)
- här [hɛːr] Yes/no questions usually have rising intonation.
Could I say Får man här låna böcker?
That word order sounds odd in a neutral question. Keep här after the object: Får man låna böcker här? Fronting Här gives a statement: Här får man låna böcker.
How do I talk about past or future permission?
- Past: Fick man låna böcker här? (Were people allowed?)
- Future: Kommer man att få låna böcker här? (Will people be allowed?)
Is there a gender‑neutral alternative to man?
Some speakers use en instead of man (e.g., Får en låna...) in informal or activist contexts. Standard, neutral Swedish still uses man.
How would I say “any/some books”?
Add några: Får man låna några böcker här? That asks whether borrowing a few/any books is allowed, often implying a limit.
Could I use a place noun instead of här?
Yes: Får man låna böcker på biblioteket? / på caféet? / i receptionen? Choose the preposition that fits the place (often på, sometimes i).