Questions & Answers about Bottnen är tunn.
What does bottnen mean here?
Bottnen is the definite singular form of en botten.
- en botten = a bottom
- bottnen = the bottom
Depending on context, botten can mean the bottom of a container, the base of something, or even the seabed/floor. In this sentence, it simply means the bottom.
Why is there no separate word for the?
Because Swedish usually puts the definite article at the end of the noun instead of using a separate word in front.
So:
- botten = bottom
- bottnen = the bottom
That -en ending is doing the job that the does in English.
Why is it bottnen and not bottenen?
This is a spelling pattern in Swedish. Some nouns change slightly when endings are added.
With botten, the unstressed e in the middle drops in inflected forms:
- en botten
- bottnen
- bottnar
So bottnen is the correct definite form, not bottenen.
What does är mean?
Why is it tunn and not tunt?
Because botten is an en-word: en botten.
When an adjective comes after är, it agrees with the gender and number of the noun:
- common gender singular (en-word) → tunn
- neuter singular (ett-word) → tunt
- plural → tunna
So:
- Bottnen är tunn. = correct
If the noun were an ett-word, you would use tunt instead.
Why doesn’t the adjective have a definite ending, since bottnen is definite?
Because tunn is being used predicatively here, after är.
In Swedish, adjectives after är usually show gender and number, but not the definite form used before nouns.
Compare:
den tunna bottnen = the thin bottom
- adjective before the noun
- definite form: tunna
bottnen är tunn = the bottom is thin
- adjective after är
- predicative form: tunn
So even though bottnen is definite, tunn is still correct here.
Could I also say den tunna bottnen?
Yes, but it does not mean exactly the same thing grammatically.
- Bottnen är tunn. = The bottom is thin.
- Den tunna bottnen = the thin bottom
The first is a full sentence.
The second is a noun phrase, not a complete sentence by itself.
Is tunn always used for physical thinness?
Not always. Tunn can be used in several ways, including:
- physically thin: en tunn vägg = a thin wall
- not thick/dense: tunt hår = thin hair
- diluted/watery: soppan är tunn = the soup is thin / watery
In Bottnen är tunn, the normal interpretation is physical thinness: the bottom is not thick.
Could I say Botten är tunn instead?
Usually, bottnen is the natural choice if you mean the bottom of a specific thing.
- botten = bottom / a bottom
- bottnen = the bottom
So if you are talking about one particular object, Bottnen är tunn is the normal form.
Botten är tunn might appear in special contexts, but for a learner, bottnen is the safe and standard choice when you mean the bottom.
What is the basic sentence structure here?
It follows a very common Swedish pattern:
subject + verb + adjective
So:
- Bottnen = subject
- är = verb
- tunn = adjective
This is directly parallel to English:
The bottom + is + thin
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning SwedishMaster Swedish — from Bottnen är tunn to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions