Mission—Team—FAQ—Privacy—Terms—Sponsors—Grammar—Typing Course—Donate

© 2026 Elon Automation B.V.

Learn Hardcore Serbian: Odjednom je počela kiša. - Suddenly it began to rain.

Hardcore Serbian
/Preparing a barbecue with friends
/Odjednom je počela kiša.

Odjednom je počela kiša.

Word

Odjednom je počela kiša.

Meaning

Suddenly it began to rain.

Part of speech

sentence

Pronunciation

Course

Hardcore Serbian

Lesson

Preparing a barbecue with friends

Breakdown of Odjednom je počela kiša.

Questions & Answers about Odjednom je počela kiša.

Why is the sentence Odjednom je počela kiša and not something like Kiša je počela odjednom?

Serbian word order is more flexible than English word order. All of these are possible, but they put the focus in different places.

Odjednom je počela kiša. = emphasis on suddenly
Kiša je odjednom počela. = emphasis more on the rain
Kiša je počela odjednom. = possible, but less natural in many contexts

Starting the sentence with odjednom is very common when you want to set the scene: Suddenly, it started to rain.

What does odjednom mean exactly?

Odjednom usually means suddenly or all at once.

In this sentence, it tells you that the rain began unexpectedly or abruptly.

A close synonym is iznenada, which also means suddenly.
So Odjednom je počela kiša and Iznenada je počela kiša are very similar.

Why is there je in the sentence?

Je is the 3rd person singular present form of the verb biti (to be), and here it helps form the perfect tense, which is one of the main past tenses in Serbian.

So:

je počela = started / has started

This is not the verb to be with its usual meaning. It is functioning as an , like English in , though Serbian uses it more broadly for past actions.

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Serbian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Serbian now

auxiliary verb

has

has started

Why is je in second position?

Serbian has a rule that short unstressed words called clitics usually go in the second position of the sentence or clause.

The word je is one of those clitics.

So in:

Odjednom je počela kiša

the first unit is Odjednom, and the clitic je comes right after it.

That is why you do not normally say:

Odjednom počela je kiša in neutral standard word order

The clitic placement is a very important feature of Serbian.

What form is počela?

Počela is the past participle of početi (to begin / to start), in the:

feminine
singular
past form used with the auxiliary

It is feminine singular because it agrees with kiša, which is a feminine singular noun.

Compare:

Kiša je počela. = The rain started.
Pljusak je počeo. = The downpour started.
Deca su počela. = The children started.

So the participle changes depending on the subject.

Why is počela feminine?

Because kiša is a feminine noun in Serbian.

In the Serbian perfect tense, the participle agrees with the subject in gender and number.

So:

kiša = feminine singular
therefore počela

If the subject were masculine singular, you would use počeo.
If it were neuter singular, počelo.
If plural, počeli / počele / počela, depending on the noun.

What case is kiša here?

Kiša is in the nominative case, because it is the subject of the sentence.

The basic dictionary form is also kiša.

So in this sentence:

kiša = the rain as the thing that began

Even though English says it started raining, Serbian often simply says the rain started.

Why doesn’t Serbian use a word for it, like in English it started raining?

Serbian usually does not need a dummy subject like English it.

English often requires a grammatical subject even when it does not refer to anything real:

It is raining
It started raining

Serbian does not work that way. It can simply say:

Pada kiša. = It is raining.
Počela je kiša. = It started raining / The rain started.

So kiša is the real subject, and no extra it is needed.

Is Odjednom je počela kiša the same as Počela je kiša?

Not exactly.

Počela je kiša. = The rain started.
Odjednom je počela kiša. = Suddenly, the rain started.

The second sentence adds the idea of surprise or abruptness through odjednom.

Why is it počela kiša and not padala kiša?

These express different ideas.

počela je kiša = the rain began / it started raining
padala je kiša = it was raining / the rain was falling

The verb početi focuses on the beginning of the action.
The verb padati focuses on the action of rain falling.

So if you want to say the moment the rain started, počela je kiša is the right idea.

What aspect is početi, and why does that matter?

Početi is a perfective verb.

In Serbian, aspect is very important:

perfective = views an action as complete, bounded, or as a whole
imperfective = views an action as ongoing, repeated, or uncompleted

Since starting is naturally a single completed event, Serbian uses the perfective početi.

That is why this sentence describes the moment when the rain began, not an ongoing process.

Could I also say Odjednom je počelo da pada?

Yes, but it means something slightly different in structure.

Odjednom je počela kiša. = Suddenly, the rain started.
Odjednom je počelo da pada. = Suddenly, it started to rain / Suddenly, it started falling.

The second version uses počelo da pada with a verb phrase instead of the noun kiša. It is also natural, though Počela je kiša is a very common and simple way to say it.

A fuller version would be:

Odjednom je počela da pada kiša.

That is also correct.

Why isn’t the sentence Odjednom je kiša počela?

That word order is possible, but it sounds more marked. It can be used when you want to keep kiša closer to the focus or contrast it with something else.

The most neutral version is:

Odjednom je počela kiša.

Because Serbian word order is flexible, different arrangements are often grammatical, but not equally neutral or common.

Can odjednom go in other positions?

Yes.

For example:

Odjednom je počela kiša.
Kiša je odjednom počela.
Kiša je počela odjednom.

All are understandable, but the first one is very natural if suddenly sets the scene.

In Serbian, adverbs often move around more freely than in English, but the placement affects emphasis and style.

Is this sentence in the past tense or present perfect?

In Serbian grammar, this is usually called the perfect (perfekat), formed with:

the auxiliary biti
plus the past participle

In English translation, it will often simply be rendered as the simple past:

Suddenly, it started raining.

Depending on context, English has started is sometimes possible, but for this sentence the most natural translation is usually simple past.

Could the auxiliary be omitted here?

In standard modern Serbian, no. You normally need the auxiliary:

Odjednom je počela kiša.

Without je, the sentence would be ungrammatical in standard language in this context.

Serbian does sometimes omit auxiliaries in certain styles, poetry, older language, or very special contexts, but that is not what is happening here.

Is there anything especially important for pronunciation?

A few useful points:

Odjednom is pronounced as one word, with the dj sound like Serbian đ-type palatal sound sequence in standard pronunciation spelling traditions, though the exact phonetic realization depends on speech.
je is very short and unstressed.
počela has č, which sounds like ch in church, but stronger and clearer.
kiša has š, like sh in shoe.

Also, because je is a clitic, it is not stressed. The main stress falls elsewhere in the sentence.

What is the most literal breakdown of the sentence?

A very literal word-by-word breakdown is:

Odjednom = suddenly
je = is/has, here an auxiliary forming the past tense
počela = started/began, feminine singular
kiša = rain

A natural English translation is:

Suddenly, it started raining.
or Suddenly, the rain started.

The Serbian structure is closer to Suddenly, the rain started.

Your questions are stored by us to improve Elon.io