Breakdown of Osiguravač će platiti naknadu štete pod uslovom da polisa osiguranja važi.
Questions & Answers about Osiguravač će platiti naknadu štete pod uslovom da polisa osiguranja važi.
What tense is će platiti, and how is it formed?
Će platiti is the future tense in Serbian, often called Future I.
It is formed with:
- the clitic će = will
- the infinitive platiti = to pay
So:
- osiguravač će platiti = the insurer will pay
A very common pattern is:
- Ja ću platiti = I will pay
- On će platiti = He will pay
- Osiguravač će platiti = The insurer will pay
In Serbian, this future construction is extremely common and works much like English will + verb.
Why is it platiti and not plaćati?
This is about verb aspect, which is very important in Serbian.
- platiti is perfective: to pay, as a completed act
- plaćati is imperfective: to be paying / to pay repeatedly / to pay in general
In this sentence, the idea is that the insurer will make one completed payment of compensation, so platiti is the natural choice.
Compare:
- Osiguravač će platiti naknadu. = The insurer will pay the compensation.
- Osiguravač će plaćati naknadu svakog meseca. = The insurer will pay compensation every month.
So platiti fits because this is a single, completed legal action.
What case is osiguravač, and why?
Osiguravač is in the nominative singular because it is the subject of the sentence.
It answers the question:
- Who will pay?
- Osiguravač = the insurer
This is the basic dictionary form of the noun:
- osiguravač = insurer
Why is it naknadu štete and not just naknada štete?
Because naknadu is the direct object of platiti, so it must be in the accusative singular.
- nominative: naknada = compensation
- accusative: naknadu
So:
- platiti naknadu = to pay compensation
The second word, štete, stays in the genitive singular, because it depends on naknada:
- naknada štete = compensation for damage / damage compensation
So the structure is:
- platiti
- naknadu = pay compensation
- compensation of what? → štete
What case is štete, and why is it used here?
Štete is genitive singular of šteta.
Here it depends on the noun naknada:
- naknada štete literally means compensation of damage
Serbian often uses a noun + genitive structure where English might use:
- for
- of
- a compound noun
So:
- naknada štete = compensation for damage
- polisa osiguranja = insurance policy
- ugovor o radu = employment contract
This is a very common pattern in formal Serbian.
What does pod uslovom da mean, and is it different from ako?
Pod uslovom da means provided that, on condition that, or as long as in a formal/legal sense.
It is more formal and more precise than ako.
Compare:
- pod uslovom da polisa osiguranja važi = provided that the insurance policy is valid
- ako polisa osiguranja važi = if the insurance policy is valid
Both can be correct, but:
- ako is more general and everyday
- pod uslovom da sounds more legal, contractual, or administrative
So in an insurance sentence, pod uslovom da is very natural.
Why is it važi and not something like će važiti?
Važi is the present tense, 3rd person singular, of važiti = to be valid / to apply.
In Serbian, after expressions like pod uslovom da, the present tense is often used to express a condition that must be true.
So:
- pod uslovom da polisa osiguranja važi = provided that the policy is valid
Using će važiti would shift the meaning toward a future state:
- provided that the policy will be valid
That is possible in some contexts, but the original sentence is talking about the policy’s validity as a condition, so the present tense sounds more natural.
Why does Serbian use važi for a policy? Can I also say je važeća?
Yes, both are possible.
Serbian commonly uses the verb važiti for documents, tickets, laws, permits, contracts, and policies:
- Karta važi do petka. = The ticket is valid until Friday.
- Polisa važi godinu dana. = The policy is valid for one year.
You can also use the adjective važeći / važeća / važeće:
- Polisa je važeća. = The policy is valid.
So these are both natural:
- pod uslovom da polisa osiguranja važi
- pod uslovom da je polisa osiguranja važeća
The version with važi is very idiomatic and common.
What case is polisa osiguranja in?
In this sentence, polisa osiguranja is the subject of the subordinate clause, so polisa is in the nominative singular.
- polisa = policy
- osiguranja = of insurance
So:
- polisa osiguranja = insurance policy
Inside that phrase:
- polisa is nominative singular
- osiguranja is genitive singular, depending on polisa
Then the whole clause is:
- polisa osiguranja važi = the insurance policy is valid
What exactly is osiguranja here?
Osiguranja is the genitive singular of osiguranje, which means insurance.
So:
- osiguranje = insurance
- polisa osiguranja = policy of insurance = insurance policy
This is another example of the very common Serbian noun + genitive structure.
Compare:
- broj telefona = phone number
- cena usluge = price of the service
- polisa osiguranja = insurance policy
Can the word order be changed?
Yes. Serbian word order is more flexible than English, although some orders sound more natural in formal writing.
The original sentence:
- Osiguravač će platiti naknadu štete pod uslovom da polisa osiguranja važi.
A very natural alternative is:
- Pod uslovom da polisa osiguranja važi, osiguravač će platiti naknadu štete.
This puts the condition first, which is also common in legal style.
One thing to remember is that će is a clitic, so it usually appears near the beginning of its clause, often in the second position:
- Osiguravač će platiti...
- Ako polisa važi, osiguravač će platiti...
So word order can move, but clitics still follow Serbian placement rules.
Why is there no word for the, as in the insurer or the policy?
Because Serbian has no articles like English a/an/the.
So:
- osiguravač can mean an insurer or the insurer
- polisa osiguranja can mean an insurance policy or the insurance policy
Which meaning is intended depends on context.
In a sentence like this, especially in legal or contract language, English would often translate it with the:
- The insurer will pay compensation provided that the insurance policy is valid.
But Serbian does not need a separate word for that.
Is this sentence formal, and would people say it in everyday conversation?
It is definitely formal and sounds like something from:
- an insurance contract
- terms and conditions
- legal or administrative writing
That formality comes from expressions like:
- osiguravač
- naknada štete
- pod uslovom da
- polisa osiguranja važi
In everyday speech, a person might say something simpler, for example:
- Platiće štetu ako polisa važi.
- Osiguranje će platiti ako je polisa važeća.
So the original sentence is perfectly correct, but it belongs more to formal written Serbian than casual conversation.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning SerbianMaster Serbian — from Osiguravač će platiti naknadu štete pod uslovom da polisa osiguranja važi to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions