Breakdown of Согласно страховому полису, страховщик возместит ущерб.
Questions & Answers about Согласно страховому полису, страховщик возместит ущерб.
Why is it страховому полису and not страховой полис?
Because согласно requires the dative case.
- страховой полис = nominative, the dictionary form
- согласно страховому полису = dative, after согласно
Both words change because the adjective must agree with the noun:
- страховой → страховому
- полис → полису
So the pattern is:
- согласно + dative
What exactly is согласно doing here?
Here согласно means according to.
In modern Russian, it is most commonly used as a preposition in sentences like this, and it governs the dative case:
- согласно договору = according to the contract
- согласно закону = according to the law
- согласно страховому полису = according to the insurance policy
It has a slightly formal or official feel, which fits insurance and legal language well.
Why is there a comma after Согласно страховому полису?
The opening phrase is being treated as a detached introductory circumstance: According to the insurance policy, ...
In Russian, a phrase like this at the beginning of a sentence is often separated by a comma, especially in formal writing or when the writer wants a small pause.
So this version is natural:
- Согласно страховому полису, страховщик возместит ущерб.
You may also sometimes see no comma in similar sentences, especially if the phrase is felt to be tightly connected to the predicate. But with this formal opening phrase, the comma is very normal.
Why is the verb возместит and not something like возмещает?
Возместит is future tense, 3rd person singular, from the perfective verb возместить.
It means the insurer will compensate / will reimburse the damage as a completed result.
Why perfective here?
- insurance policies usually talk about a concrete future result
- the idea is not the process of compensating, but the fact that compensation will be made
Compare:
- возместит = will compensate, will make good on it
- будет возмещать = will be compensating, will compensate over time/process-wise
- возмещает = compensates / is compensating
In this sentence, возместит is the most natural choice.
What case is ущерб, and why does it not change form?
Ущерб is in the accusative case because it is the direct object of возместит.
The reason it looks unchanged is that it is an inanimate masculine noun. For inanimate masculine nouns, the accusative singular is usually the same as the nominative singular.
So:
- nominative: ущерб
- accusative: ущерб
That is completely normal in Russian.
How do I know who is doing what in this sentence?
Russian shows sentence roles partly through case and partly through verb agreement.
Here is the structure:
- страховщик = nominative singular, the subject
- возместит = will compensate
- ущерб = accusative object, the thing being compensated
- согласно страховому полису = according to the insurance policy
So:
- страховщик is the one performing the action
- ущерб is what gets compensated
Even if the word order changes, the cases help you identify the roles.
Can the word order be changed?
Yes. Russian word order is flexible, though not random.
For example, you could also say:
- Страховщик возместит ущерб согласно страховому полису.
This is a bit more neutral in flow: subject + verb + object + qualifying phrase.
The original version:
- Согласно страховому полису, страховщик возместит ущерб.
puts emphasis first on the basis or authority for the statement: the insurance policy.
So the difference is mainly about focus and style, not basic meaning.
Why is the subject страховщик and not страховая компания?
Страховщик is a more formal/legal term meaning insurer.
It refers to the party that provides insurance and is legally responsible under the policy. In legal or contractual language, this word is very common.
By contrast:
- страховая компания = insurance company
That is more everyday and concrete. In many contexts they may refer to the same real-world entity, but страховщик sounds more precise and official.
What is the difference between ущерб and other words like вред or убытки?
These words overlap, but they are not identical.
- ущерб = damage, loss, detriment; often material, financial, or legal
- вред = harm; often broader, including physical or moral harm
- убытки = losses, especially financial losses
In insurance/legal contexts, ущерб is very common for damage that can be compensated.
So in this sentence, ущерб fits very well.
How should I pronounce the key words in this sentence?
The main stress patterns are:
- соглáсно
- страховóму
- пóлису
- страховщи́к
- возмести́т
- уще́рб
Stress matters in Russian, so it is worth learning these together with the words themselves.
Is страховому just an adjective form, and how does it match полису?
Yes. Страховому is the dative singular masculine/neuter form of the adjective страховой.
It agrees with полису, which is also dative singular masculine.
So the agreement is:
- adjective: страховому
- noun: полису
This is a standard Russian pattern: adjectives change to match the noun in gender, number, and case.
So once согласно forces the noun into the dative, the adjective must go into the dative too.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning RussianMaster Russian — from Согласно страховому полису, страховщик возместит ущерб to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions