Fundusz remontowy pokryje wydatek.

Fundusz means fund, and remontowy means related to repairs/renovation.

So fundusz remontowy is a repair fund, renovation fund, or maintenance fund, depending on context. In housing/building contexts, it often means money set aside for repairs.

In Polish, adjectives often come after the noun in fixed or neutral expressions like this, especially when the adjective is classifying the noun rather than describing it emotionally or stylistically.

So fundusz remontowy sounds natural and standard.
A word-for-word English order like remontowy fundusz would sound less natural here.

Pokryje means will cover, so it is future in meaning.

It comes from the perfective verb pokryć. In Polish, perfective verbs use present-tense-looking forms to talk about the future. So although pokryje looks like a present form structurally, it is translated as future:

• pokryje = will cover

Because pokryć is a perfective verb, and perfective verbs normally express a completed future action with a simple form like pokryje.

So:

• pokryje wydatek = will cover the expense as a completed act

If you said będzie pokrywać, that would come from the imperfective verb pokrywać and would suggest something ongoing, repeated, or viewed as a process instead.

It is in the nominative singular, because it is the subject of the sentence.

You can see the agreement:

• fundusz — masculine singular noun
• remontowy — masculine singular adjective matching fundusz

So the whole subject is fundusz remontowy = the repair fund.

Wydatek is in the accusative singular, because it is the direct object of pokryje.

The reason it looks the same as the nominative is that wydatek is a masculine inanimate noun. For many masculine inanimate nouns in Polish:

• nominative singular = accusative singular

So:

• nominative: wydatek
• accusative: wydatek

That is completely normal.

Pokryć wydatek is a very natural Polish expression meaning to cover an expense, to pay for an expense, or to meet the cost.

It is close to pay, but not always identical in nuance. Pokryć often focuses on the idea that funds are sufficient for the expense.

So this sentence suggests that the repair fund will provide the money needed for that expense.

Because Polish does not have articles like a and the.

Whether something is understood as a fund, the fund, an expense, or the expense depends on context.

So Fundusz remontowy pokryje wydatek could be understood in English as:

• The repair fund will cover the expense
• A repair fund will cover an expense

In most real contexts, the intended meaning is usually clear.

Yes. Polish word order is more flexible than English word order because case endings show what each word is doing.

The given sentence:

• Fundusz remontowy pokryje wydatek

is a neutral, straightforward order.

You could also say:

• Wydatek pokryje fundusz remontowy

This still means the same basic thing, but it gives more emphasis or focus to wydatek.

So the original version is the most neutral choice for a learner.

They are similar, but not identical.

• wydatek = expense, outlay, money that is spent
• koszt = cost, the price or amount something costs

In many contexts they overlap, but wydatek often sounds more like a budget item or expenditure, while koszt is the general cost of something.

So pokryje wydatek is a very natural phrase when talking about covering an expense from a fund.