Nie dość, że zwycięzca dostał punkt zwycięstwa, to jeszcze wygrał partię.

It is a very common Polish pattern meaning not only ..., but also ... or as if it weren’t enough that ..., ... as well.

So the structure is:

Nie dość, że X, to jeszcze Y.

It adds emphasis and often suggests surprise, annoyance, or piling one fact on top of another.

In this sentence, it means something like: Not only did the winner get a victory point, but he also won the game.

In this expression, że introduces the first full clause.

So:

• nie dość = not enough
• że = that

Very literally, the pattern is something like: It’s not enough that X, Y also happened.

You normally learn this as a fixed structure: Nie dość, że ..., to jeszcze ...

So in practice, it is best to memorize the whole pattern rather than trying to translate each word separately.

Here to helps introduce the second part of the construction. It does not have a neat one-word English equivalent.

In this pattern:

• Nie dość, że ...
• to jeszcze ...

the to works like a connector: then / and on top of that / and what’s more.

It is very natural in this structure. Without it, the sentence would sound less standard or less balanced.

Not in this sentence.

Jeszcze has several meanings depending on context:

• still
• yet
• more
• in addition / on top of that

Here it means: in addition / on top of that / even

So to jeszcze wygrał partię means: and on top of that, he won the game

Because some Polish masculine nouns, especially nouns referring to people, end in -a.

Zwycięzca means winner and is grammatically masculine when it refers to a male person, even though its nominative singular ends in -a.

This is not unusual in Polish. Other examples include:

• mężczyzna = man
• kolega = male friend / colleague

So the ending -a does not automatically mean the noun is feminine.

We know from the past-tense verb forms:

• dostał
• wygrał

The ending -ł here shows masculine singular past tense.

So the sentence tells us that the subject is a masculine singular person: the winner got... and won...

If the subject were feminine, you would expect:

• dostała
• wygrała

Both are past-tense, masculine singular verb forms:

• dostał = got / received
• wygrał = won

They are also perfective verbs:

• dostać = to receive, to get
• wygrać = to win

Perfective verbs are natural here because the sentence refers to completed single events:

• he got a point
• he won the game

If you used imperfective forms, the meaning would shift toward repetition, process, or habit.

Because zwycięstwa is in the genitive singular and modifies punkt.

This is a common Polish noun+noun structure:

• punkt zwycięstwa = victory point
• literally: point of victory

So:

• punkt = point
• zwycięstwa = of victory

Polish often uses the genitive after another noun where English would use a noun as an adjective-like modifier.

Punkt is the direct object of dostał, so it is in the accusative singular.

However, for many masculine inanimate nouns, the accusative singular has the same form as the nominative singular.

So:

• nominative: punkt
• accusative: punkt

That is why the form does not change here.

Because partię is the accusative singular of partia.

The verb wygrać takes a direct object, so the noun must be in the accusative:

• nominative: partia
• accusative: partię

So:

• wygrał partię = he won the game/match

This is a very common pattern with transitive verbs in Polish.

Not here.

Partia can mean different things depending on context, including:

• political party
• game / round / match
• batch / lot

In this sentence, because it follows wygrał and the context is about points and a winner, it means: a game, a round, or a match

So wygrał partię means he won the game/match, not he won a political party.

Because Polish often avoids repeating the subject when it is already clear.

In this sentence, zwycięzca is the subject of both verbs:

• dostał
• wygrał

So there is no need to repeat it. Polish commonly leaves the subject understood if the meaning is obvious.

A more repetitive version would be possible, but it would sound heavier: Nie dość, że zwycięzca dostał punkt zwycięstwa, to jeszcze zwycięzca wygrał partię.

That is grammatically possible, but stylistically clumsy.

The overall pattern is fairly fixed:

Nie dość, że ..., to jeszcze ...

That part is best kept as it is.

Inside each clause, Polish word order is more flexible than English, but the original order is the most neutral and natural:

Nie dość, że zwycięzca dostał punkt zwycięstwa, to jeszcze wygrał partię.

You could sometimes move words around for emphasis, but that would sound more marked. For a learner, the best approach is to keep this standard order.

Because the sentence contains two clauses and uses a correlative structure:

Nie dość, że X, to jeszcze Y.

The comma after że-clause is standard:

• Nie dość, że zwycięzca dostał punkt zwycięstwa, to jeszcze wygrał partię.

You can think of it as separating:

1. the first statement
2. the added statement introduced by to jeszcze

So the punctuation helps show the sentence structure clearly.