Breakdown of Przekazuję jedwab wraz z aksamitem.
Questions & Answers about Przekazuję jedwab wraz z aksamitem.
Why is there no word for I in the sentence?
In Polish, the subject pronoun is often omitted because the verb ending already shows who is doing the action.
Here, przekazuję means I am handing over / I hand over / I transfer. The ending -ę tells you the subject is I.
So:
- Przekazuję jedwab wraz z aksamitem. = I am handing over silk along with velvet.
- Ja przekazuję... is possible, but ja is usually added only for emphasis, contrast, or clarity.
What exactly does przekazuję mean here?
Przekazuję is the 1st person singular present tense of przekazywać.
Depending on context, it can mean:
- I hand over
- I pass on
- I transfer
- I convey
In this sentence, it most naturally means something like I am handing over or I transfer.
A useful point for learners: Polish present tense can often translate into either simple present or present continuous in English, depending on context.
Why is it jedwab, but aksamitem?
Because the two nouns are in different grammatical cases.
- jedwab is the direct object of przekazuję, so it is in the accusative case
- aksamitem comes after wraz z, which requires the instrumental case
So:
- jedwab = accusative (same form here as nominative because it is an inanimate masculine noun)
- aksamitem = instrumental singular of aksamit
This is very common in Polish: different parts of the sentence require different cases.
Why does wraz z require aksamitem in the instrumental case?
Because z in the sense of with takes the instrumental case, and wraz z behaves the same way.
So:
- z aksamitem = with velvet
- wraz z aksamitem = together with velvet / along with velvet
That is why you get aksamitem, not aksamit.
A few similar examples:
- z przyjacielem = with a friend
- wraz z dokumentami = together with the documents
- z rodziną = with the family
What is the difference between wraz z and just z?
Both can mean with, but wraz z is usually a bit more formal or explicit.
- z aksamitem = with velvet
- wraz z aksamitem = together with velvet / along with velvet
So wraz z often emphasizes that one thing accompanies another. In many contexts, it sounds slightly more official, written, or careful than plain z.
In everyday speech, people often just use z unless they want that extra nuance.
Is przekazuję present tense or future tense?
It is present tense.
The verb przekazywać is imperfective, so its present-tense forms describe:
- an action happening now,
- a habitual action,
- or sometimes a planned action, depending on context.
So przekazuję can mean:
- I am handing over
- I hand over
- sometimes I’m in the process of transferring
If you wanted a perfective future idea such as I will hand over (once, completely), Polish would typically use przekażę from the perfective verb przekazać.
Why does jedwab not change form in the accusative?
Because jedwab is a masculine inanimate noun, and for many masculine inanimate nouns, the accusative singular looks the same as the nominative singular.
So:
- nominative: jedwab
- accusative: jedwab
That is normal.
Compare:
- Mam stół. = I have a table.
(stół stays masculine inanimate, though its accusative can match nominative depending on form) - Widzę jedwab. = I see silk.
By contrast, masculine animate nouns usually change in the accusative:
- nominative: student
- accusative: studenta
What case is jedwab exactly?
In this sentence, jedwab is in the accusative singular because it is the thing being handed over.
The verb przekazywać usually takes a direct object in the accusative.
So the structure is:
- Przekazuję = I hand over
- jedwab = silk (the thing being handed over)
Even though jedwab looks the same as the dictionary form, its function here is accusative.
Could the word order be changed?
Yes. Polish word order is more flexible than English because case endings show grammatical relationships.
The neutral order here is:
- Przekazuję jedwab wraz z aksamitem.
But other orders are possible, for example:
- Jedwab przekazuję wraz z aksamitem.
- Wraz z aksamitem przekazuję jedwab.
These alternatives change the emphasis, not the core meaning.
Very roughly:
- starting with jedwab emphasizes silk
- starting with wraz z aksamitem emphasizes the accompanying item
Still, the original version is a natural, straightforward order.
Is aksamit a countable noun here, or more like a material word such as velvet in English?
Here it is being used as a material noun, similar to English silk or velvet.
So jedwab and aksamit refer to substances or fabrics, not individual objects.
That is why the sentence sounds like handing over silk together with velvet, rather than handing over a specific silk item and a specific velvet item.
In other contexts, Polish can also use such nouns in more concrete ways, depending on what is meant.
Could this sentence mean I am conveying silk along with velvet in an abstract sense, or is it physical?
Most naturally, it sounds physical here: handing over or transferring the material silk together with velvet.
The verb przekazywać can also be used abstractly, for example:
- przekazywać informacje = to pass on information
- przekazywać wiadomość = to convey a message
But because the objects here are physical materials, the sentence is most likely about an actual transfer of goods or items.
Would razem z aksamitem also be possible?
Yes, razem z aksamitem is also possible and means roughly together with velvet.
Compare:
- wraz z aksamitem — a bit more formal / written / official
- razem z aksamitem — natural, common, often a bit more conversational
Both are correct. The choice depends on style and tone more than grammar.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning PolishMaster Polish — from Przekazuję jedwab wraz z aksamitem to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions