Breakdown of Foreldrepengene og engangsstønaden gir penger.
Questions & Answers about Foreldrepengene og engangsstønaden gir penger.
Why is there no separate word for the in Foreldrepengene and engangsstønaden?
In Norwegian, the definite article is usually attached to the end of the noun instead of being a separate word.
So:
- stønad = grant / benefit
- stønaden = the grant / the benefit
And similarly:
- foreldrepenger = parental benefit / parental money
- foreldrepengene = the parental benefit / the parental money
This is one of the biggest differences from English. English says the before the noun; Norwegian often adds the definiteness to the noun itself.
Why does Foreldrepengene end in -ne?
The ending -ne is a common definite plural ending in Norwegian.
A learner might expect this pattern:
- en bil = a car
- biler = cars
- bilene = the cars
So -ne often signals the ...s.
With foreldrepengene, this is a little tricky, because foreldrepenger is a word that is normally used in a plural form, much like some money-related words in English can behave in special ways. In practice, you should learn foreldrepenger as a fixed vocabulary item meaning a type of parental benefit/payment, and foreldrepengene as its definite form.
So yes, the -ne points to a definite plural form.
Why does engangsstønaden end in -en?
The ending -en is the usual definite singular ending for many masculine nouns.
For example:
- en gutt = a boy
- gutten = the boy
Likewise:
- en engangsstønad = a one-time grant
- engangsstønaden = the one-time grant
So -en here means the noun is singular and definite.
Why is the verb gir and not something different for a plural subject?
Norwegian verbs do not change according to the subject the way English verbs sometimes do.
In English:
- I give
- he gives
- they give
In Norwegian, the verb stays the same:
- jeg gir
- han gir
- de gir
So even though the subject here is made up of two things — Foreldrepengene og engangsstønaden — the verb is still just gir.
Why is penger not pengene?
Because the sentence is talking about money in a general sense, not the money specifically.
Compare:
- gir penger = gives money
- gir pengene = gives the money
This works a lot like English. If you mean money in general, you do not make it definite. If you mean a specific amount already known in the conversation, you would use the definite form.
What role does og play in the sentence?
Og means and.
It connects the two subject nouns:
- Foreldrepengene
- engangsstønaden
Together they form a compound subject:
Foreldrepengene og engangsstønaden = the parental benefit and the one-time grant
Then the rest of the sentence is:
- gir = give
- penger = money
So the sentence structure is:
Subject + verb + object
Is foreldrepenger singular or plural?
Grammatically, it is treated as a plural-form noun. The word literally contains penger, which is money in a plural form.
But as a vocabulary item, foreldrepenger refers to one type of benefit: parental benefit/pay. So learners often find it confusing because the meaning feels singular, while the form looks plural.
The safest approach is:
- learn foreldrepenger as the standard dictionary form of the benefit
- learn foreldrepengene as the definite form used when talking about that specific benefit
So it is best not to over-translate it word by word.
Why is the word order so simple here?
This sentence is a basic Norwegian main clause with normal word order:
Subject + verb + object
- Foreldrepengene og engangsstønaden = subject
- gir = verb
- penger = object
This is the same basic order as in English:
The parental benefit and the one-time grant give money.
Norwegian does have special word order rules, especially the verb-second rule, but in a simple statement like this, the sentence looks very straightforward.
Could I say Foreldrepenger og engangsstønad gir penger without the endings?
Yes, but it would change the meaning.
- Foreldrepengene og engangsstønaden = the parental benefit and the one-time grant
- Foreldrepenger og engangsstønad = parental benefit and one-time grant more generally
The version with endings is definite and points to specific, known benefits. The version without them is more general or dictionary-like.
So the endings matter because they tell you whether the nouns are definite.
Is this sentence fully natural Norwegian?
It is grammatically understandable, but depending on context, a native speaker might choose a more natural phrasing such as one that makes it clearer that these are financial support schemes.
Still, for a learner, this sentence is useful because it clearly shows:
- definite noun endings
- a compound subject with og
- the verb gir
- the object penger
So even if it may sound a bit simplified or instructional, it is a good sentence for studying basic Norwegian grammar.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning NorwegianMaster Norwegian — from Foreldrepengene og engangsstønaden gir penger to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions