Breakdown of Nautae remigio navem e sinu trahunt.
Questions & Answers about Nautae remigio navem e sinu trahunt.
Why is nautae plural, and what case is it?
Nautae is nominative plural, so it means sailors and serves as the subject of the sentence.
The dictionary form is nauta, nautae = sailor. Even though it ends in -a in the singular and belongs to the first declension, it is masculine because it refers to a male person by default.
So here:
- nautae = the sailors
- it is plural because the verb trahunt is also plural: they drag / they pull
What case is navem, and why?
Navem is accusative singular.
It is the direct object of trahunt (they pull / drag), so it answers the question what are the sailors pulling?
- navis = ship
- navem = ship in the accusative singular
So:
- nautae = subject
- navem = direct object
What does remigio mean here, and what case is it?
Remigio is ablative singular of remigium.
Here it means something like:
- by rowing
- with oar-power
- by means of rowing
This is an ablative of means/instrument: it tells you how the action is done.
So the sailors are pulling the ship by rowing, not necessarily by literally grabbing it with their hands.
Why is it remigio and not a plural form if several sailors are rowing?
Because Latin often uses the singular for the means or method in a general sense.
Remigio does not mean one oar here. It means rowing or the act/power of rowing as a collective method.
So even though many sailors are involved, Latin can still say:
- remigio = by rowing
This is similar to English saying by force or by effort without making the word plural.
What is e sinu doing in the sentence?
E sinu means out of the bay or from the bay/inlet.
- e / ex = out of, from
- sinu = ablative singular of sinus
The preposition e/ex takes the ablative, so sinu is ablative because it depends on e.
This phrase tells you from where the ship is being pulled.
Why is it e sinu instead of ex sinu?
Both e and ex mean out of / from.
Latin often uses:
- ex before vowels or sometimes for clarity/emphasis
- e before consonants
Since sinu begins with s, e sinu is perfectly normal.
In many texts, the choice between e and ex can also depend on style or sound, not just a rigid rule.
What does sinus mean here? I thought it could mean fold or curve.
Yes, sinus has several related meanings, including:
- fold
- curve
- bosom
- bay / gulf / inlet
Here, because the sentence is about sailors and a ship, e sinu is naturally understood as out of the bay or from the inlet.
This is a good example of how Latin words often have a core image and then several related meanings depending on context.
What tense is trahunt?
Trahunt is present active indicative, third person plural.
It comes from traho, trahere = to drag, pull, draw.
So trahunt means:
- they pull
- they are pulling
- sometimes, depending on context, they pull habitually
Because the subject is plural (nautae), the verb is plural too.
Why is the verb at the end?
Latin word order is much more flexible than English word order because case endings show what each word is doing.
Putting the verb at the end is very common in Latin prose, although not required.
So:
- Nautae remigio navem e sinu trahunt
- literally: Sailors by-rowing the ship out-of-the-bay pull
A more English-like order would be:
- Nautae navem e sinu remigio trahunt
But Latin often prefers to place the verb last.
Could the words be rearranged without changing the basic meaning?
Yes, to a large extent.
Because the endings show the grammatical roles:
- nautae = subject
- navem = direct object
- remigio = means
- e sinu = from where
- trahunt = verb
the sentence could be rearranged in different ways and still keep the same basic meaning.
For example:
- Navem nautae e sinu remigio trahunt
- E sinu navem nautae trahunt
- Nautae navem trahunt e sinu remigio
However, word order can affect emphasis. The original order may guide the reader through the sentence in a particular way.
Why are there no words for the or a?
Classical Latin has no articles like English the and a/an.
So:
- nautae can mean sailors or the sailors
- navem can mean a ship or the ship
- sinu can mean a bay or the bay
The context tells you which is meant.
That is why one Latin sentence can often be translated into English in more than one natural way.
Is trahunt the best way to understand the action, or should I imagine something more specific?
Trahunt basically means pull, drag, or draw.
In this sentence, because remigio is present, the idea is probably not that the sailors are physically hauling the ship by ropes on land. Instead, the sense is more like:
- they draw the ship out of the bay by rowing
- they propel the ship out of the inlet
So trahunt can sometimes be a little broader than simple hand-pulling. Context helps determine the natural English meaning.
How would this sentence be translated very literally?
A very literal translation would be:
The sailors pull the ship out of the bay by rowing.
Or, preserving the Latin order more closely:
The sailors by rowing pull the ship out of the bay.
That kind of literal version is useful for seeing how each Latin word works, even if a smoother English translation might sound better.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Nautae remigio navem e sinu trahunt to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions