Breakdown of Auspex diem confarreationis probat.
Questions & Answers about Auspex diem confarreationis probat.
Why is auspex the subject of the sentence?
Because auspex is in the nominative singular, which is the case normally used for the subject in Latin.
Here, auspex means an augur / diviner / official observer of omens, and it is the person doing the action of probat.
So grammatically:
- auspex = subject
- probat = verb
- diem = direct object
What form is probat, and what does that tell me?
Probat is:
- present tense
- indicative mood
- active voice
- 3rd person singular
So it means he/she/it approves, finds acceptable, or judges favorable, depending on context.
Because the subject is auspex, the sense is the augur approves or declares favorable.
Why is diem in the accusative?
Diem is the accusative singular of dies, meaning day.
It is accusative because it is the direct object of probat. In other words, it is the thing being approved.
So the structure is:
- auspex = the one approving
- diem = the day being approved
- probat = approves
What case is confarreationis, and why is it used here?
Confarreationis is genitive singular.
It depends on diem and means of the confarreatio. So diem confarreationis means the day of the confarreatio.
This is a very common Latin pattern:
- noun + genitive
- day of X
- book of X
- fear of X
- and so on
So confarreationis is not the object of the verb; it is modifying diem.
What is confarreatio?
Confarreatio was a specific ancient Roman form of marriage, especially associated with the patrician class and certain religious traditions.
The word is fairly specialized, so a learner might not recognize it immediately. In this sentence, you do not need to know every historical detail to understand the grammar:
- base noun: confarreatio
- form here: confarreationis = of the confarreatio
So grammatically it works just like any other genitive singular noun.
Why is it confarreationis and not something like confarreationem?
Because the sentence is not saying that the augur approves the confarreatio itself directly.
If it were confarreationem, that would be accusative singular, and it would make confarreatio the direct object of probat.
But here the direct object is diem. The noun confarreationis is only describing which day:
- diem = the day
- confarreationis = of the confarreatio
So the meaning is the day of the confarreatio, not the confarreatio by itself.
What declensions are these nouns from?
They come from different declensions:
- auspex: third declension
- nominative singular: auspex
- dies: fifth declension
- accusative singular: diem
- confarreatio: third declension
- genitive singular: confarreationis
This sentence is a good example of how Latin can mix declensions freely in one clause.
Why doesn’t Latin use words for the or a here?
Classical Latin normally has no articles.
So Latin often leaves it to context whether you should understand:
- the augur
- an augur
and likewise:
- the day
- a day
In this sentence, English usually needs an article, but Latin does not.
Is the word order important here?
The word order is meaningful, but not in the same rigid way as in English.
Latin uses endings more than position to show grammatical roles, so the sentence could be rearranged without changing the basic meaning, for example:
- Auspex diem confarreationis probat
- Diem confarreationis auspex probat
- Auspex probat diem confarreationis
All of these still mean roughly the same thing because:
- auspex is nominative
- diem is accusative
- confarreationis is genitive
The given order is perfectly natural and straightforward.
Does probat here mean approves, tests, or proves?
Latin probo, probare can cover several related ideas, including:
- approve
- find good
- judge acceptable
- test
- prove
In this sentence, with diem as the object and auspex as the subject, the sense is most naturally something like:
- approves the day
- declares the day favorable
- judges the day suitable
So the context points toward approval / favorable judgment, not mathematical or logical proof.
Could auspex be translated as bird-watcher?
Etymologically, yes, the word is connected with observing birds and omens. But in normal translation here, auspex is better rendered as something like:
- augur
- diviner
- omens-observer
- religious official who interprets signs
A literal translation like bird-watcher would miss the religious and official sense.
How would this sentence be pronounced?
A classical-style pronunciation would be approximately:
OWS-peks dee-em kon-far-ray-AH-tee-oh-nis PRO-bat
A few helpful points:
- au in auspex sounds like ow in cow
- diem is two syllables: di-em
- ti in confarreatio is usually pronounced like tee, not like English sh
- probat has a clear t at the end
If using an ecclesiastical pronunciation, some sounds may differ, but the grammar remains the same.
What is the basic grammatical structure of the whole sentence?
It is:
subject + object + genitive modifier + verb
More specifically:
- Auspex = subject, nominative singular
- diem = direct object, accusative singular
- confarreationis = genitive singular modifying diem
- probat = 3rd person singular present active verb
So the sentence is a simple main clause with one noun phrase inside it:
- main clause: Auspex ... probat
- object phrase: diem confarreationis
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Auspex diem confarreationis probat to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions