jeoneun ibeon suribireul boheomeuro bosangbadasseoyo.

저는 marks I as the topic of the sentence.

• 저 = I, me
• 는 = topic particle

It gives the sense of as for me or speaking of me. In natural Korean, 저는 is often omitted if the speaker is already understood from context. So:

• 저는 이번 수리비를 보험으로 보상받았어요.
• 이번 수리비를 보험으로 보상받았어요.

Both can be natural, depending on context. The version with 저는 is a little clearer or more contrastive.

이번 means this time or this current one.

In this sentence, it modifies 수리비 and means something like:

• this repair bill
• this time’s repair cost

So 이번 수리비 is not just any repair bill, but the one from the current situation being discussed.

수리비 means repair cost or repair bill.

It is made from:

• 수리 = repair
• 비 = expense, fee, cost

So 수리비 is the money spent on repairing something, such as a car, appliance, or house item.

를 is the object particle. It marks 수리비 as the thing affected by the verb.

Here, the verb is 보상받았어요, which means received compensation. What was compensated?
→ 이번 수리비를 = the repair cost

So the structure is:

• 이번 수리비를 = the repair cost
• 보험으로 = through insurance / by insurance
• 보상받았어요 = received compensation

보험으로 means through insurance, by insurance, or using insurance.

• 보험 = insurance
• -으로 often marks a means, method, tool, or way

So this phrase shows the method or source through which the speaker got compensated.

A useful way to think about it:

• 보험으로 보상받다 = to get compensated through insurance

English speakers often expect something like from insurance, and Korean can also express that idea in other ways, but -으로 is very natural here because it emphasizes the means/channel.

보상받았어요 literally means received compensation.

It comes from:

• 보상 = compensation
• 받다 = to receive
• 받았어요 = received (past polite form)

So instead of saying insurance compensated me, Korean often says I received compensation through insurance.

This is a very common Korean way to express the idea.

Because the speaker is the one who received the compensation, not the one who gave it.

• 보상하다 = to compensate someone
• 보상받다 = to receive compensation

So:

• 보험회사가 저를 보상했어요 would mean something like the insurance company compensated me
• 저는 보험으로 보상받았어요 means I received compensation through insurance

For this sentence, 보상받다 is the natural choice because the speaker is talking about their own experience as the receiver.

Not exactly in the same way as an English passive like was compensated.

Korean often uses Noun + 받다 to mean receive N, and that can sound passive-like in English. But grammatically, 받다 is an active verb meaning to receive.

So 보상받았어요 is closer to:

• I received compensation

rather than a strict passive form.

The sentence follows normal Korean word order: topic / object / method / verb.

• 저는 = as for me
• 이번 수리비를 = this repair bill
• 보험으로 = through insurance
• 보상받았어요 = received compensation

So the pattern is roughly:

As for me, this repair bill, through insurance, received compensation.

That sounds unnatural in English, but it is a normal Korean structure because the verb comes at the end.

받았어요 is:

• past tense
• polite speech style

It comes from 받다:

• dictionary form: 받다
• past stem: 받았-
• polite ending: -어요

So 보상받았어요 means received compensation in polite everyday speech.

A more formal version would be:

• 보상받았습니다

A casual version would be:

• 보상받았어

Yes. A very literal translation would sound awkward in English, so natural translations might be:

• I got this repair bill covered by insurance.
• I was compensated for this repair cost through insurance.
• Insurance covered this repair bill for me.

These all match the Korean idea, even though the Korean literally focuses on receiving compensation.

It is normally written as one word: 보상받았어요.

That is because 보상받다 functions as a combined verb meaning to receive compensation. Korean has many similar combinations of a noun plus 하다 or 받다 that become standard verbal expressions.

So the standard spacing here is:

• 보상받았어요 ✔
• 보상 받았어요 is much less standard in this context