jeoneun achimmada gongwoneseo ttwieoyo.

Both mean I + topic marker, but they differ in tone:

• 저는 is more polite and humble.
• 나는 is more casual.

Because 뛰어요 is also a polite form, 저는 matches the level of politeness naturally.

So:

• 저는 아침마다 공원에서 뛰어요. = polite
• 나는 아침마다 공원에서 뛰어. = casual

는 is the topic marker. It marks 저 as the topic of the sentence.

So 저는 is not just I; it is more like:

• As for me, ...
• I, ...

In this sentence, it sets up the speaker as the topic: As for me, I run in the park every morning.

아침 means morning, and 마다 means every or each when attached to a noun.

So:

• 아침 = morning
• 아침마다 = every morning

It gives the idea of something happening repeatedly on each morning.

They are very similar, and both can often be translated as every morning.

• 아침마다 = every morning, literally each morning
• 매일 아침 = every day in the morning / every morning

In many everyday contexts, they are interchangeable.

Examples:

• 저는 아침마다 공원에서 뛰어요.
• 저는 매일 아침 공원에서 뛰어요.

Both sound natural.

This is a very common question.

• 에서 marks the place where an action happens
• 에 often marks a destination, time, or location of existence

Since 뛰다 is an action verb and the running happens in the park, Korean uses 에서:

• 공원에서 뛰어요 = run in the park

If you said 공원에, it would not fit as naturally with the idea of the action taking place there.

A useful shortcut:

• action happening somewhere -> 에서
• going to somewhere / being at somewhere -> often 에

The dictionary form is 뛰다.

So the sentence breaks down like this:

• 뛰다 = to run, to jump
• 뛰어요 = polite present tense form

In this sentence, because of the context, it means run, not jump.

It can mean both, depending on context.

• 공원에서 뛰어요 usually means run in the park
• In another context, 뛰다 could mean jump

Context tells you which meaning is intended. With 아침마다 공원에서, the meaning run is the natural one.

Korean is generally a Subject-Object-Verb language, and the verb usually comes at the end of the sentence.

So in this sentence:

• 저는 = as for me
• 아침마다 = every morning
• 공원에서 = in the park
• 뛰어요 = run

This final verb placement is normal in Korean.

Yes, Korean word order is more flexible than English because particles show each word’s role.

For example, these can all sound natural:

• 저는 아침마다 공원에서 뛰어요.
• 저는 공원에서 아침마다 뛰어요.
• 아침마다 저는 공원에서 뛰어요.

However, the most neutral and easy-to-follow order is often the original one.

Even though order can change, the verb usually still stays at the end.

뛰어요 is the polite informal style, often called the -아요/어요 style.

It is commonly used:

• in everyday conversation
• with people you do not speak casually to
• in polite but natural situations

It is less formal than 뜁니다, but more polite than 뛰어.

Comparison:

• 뛰어 = casual
• 뛰어요 = polite everyday speech
• 뜁니다 = formal

Yes. Korean often omits subjects when they are understood from context.

So you could simply say:

• 아침마다 공원에서 뛰어요.

This can still naturally mean I run in the park every morning if the speaker is already understood.

Korean leaves out words more often than English does.

This word can feel tricky for English speakers.

A simple guide:

• 뛰 sounds roughly like ttwi
• 어요 sounds like eo-yo

So 뛰어요 is approximately ttwi-eo-yo.

The first consonant ㄸ is a tense sound, stronger than plain ㄷ. You do not need to make it perfect right away; being understood matters more at first.

Yes. The combination of 아침마다 and the present tense 뛰어요 expresses a habitual or repeated action.

So the sentence does not mean just I am running in the park this morning.

It means something like:

• I run in the park every morning
• I regularly run in the park every morning

Yes, depending on context.

Korean 뛰다 is broader than English run in some cases, so in natural English this sentence could be translated as:

• I run in the park every morning.
• I jog in the park every morning.

If the context is exercise, jog can be a very natural English translation.