hotel bokdo kkeut bisanggu apeneun gabangeul dumyeon an dwaeyo.

A natural breakdown is:

• 호텔 복도 끝 = the end of the hotel hallway
• 비상구 앞에는 = in front of the emergency exit
• 가방을 두면 안 돼요 = you must not leave/put a bag

So the whole sentence is structured like:

• [place] + [object] + [action you must not do]

More literally, it is:

• At the front of the emergency exit at the end of the hotel hallway, it is not okay to leave a bag.

That sounds a little stiff in English, so a natural translation is:

• Don’t leave a bag in front of the emergency exit at the end of the hotel hallway.

복도 끝 means the end of the hallway/corridor.

Here, Korean is using a very common noun + noun structure:

• 복도 = hallway, corridor
• 끝 = end

So 복도 끝 literally means hallway end, which in natural English becomes the end of the hallway.

There is no particle between them because this is just a compound-style noun phrase. Korean often links nouns this way:

• 학교 앞 = in front of the school
• 방 문 = room door
• 책 표지 = book cover

So 복도 끝 is completely normal.

Let’s split it up:

• 비상구 = emergency exit
• 앞 = front
• 에 = at/in/on (location particle)
• 는 = topic marker

So:

• 비상구 앞에 = in front of the emergency exit
• 비상구 앞에는 = as for in front of the emergency exit...

The 에 marks the location, and 는 adds topical or contrastive emphasis.

So 앞에는 can feel like:

• in front of the emergency exit, at least...
• as for the area in front of the emergency exit...
• in front of the emergency exit, you must not...

In signs, warnings, and rules, this kind of phrasing is very common.

Because 에는 is 에 + 는.

• 에 marks the place where something happens
• 는 marks that place as the topic, often with a slight contrastive feeling

So:

• 비상구 앞에 가방을 두면 안 돼요 = You must not leave a bag in front of the emergency exit.
• 비상구 앞에는 가방을 두면 안 돼요 = As for in front of the emergency exit, you must not leave a bag there.

The version with 는 feels a bit more like a rule or restriction about that specific place.

Yes. Korean often puts one noun directly before another to describe it.

So:

• 호텔 복도 = hotel hallway
• 호텔 복도 끝 = the end of the hotel hallway

This is similar to English noun-noun combinations like:

• school bus
• office chair
• hotel room

Korean could also sometimes use possessive-style expressions, but here the direct noun combination is the most natural.

Because 가방 is the object of the verb 두다.

• 가방을 두다 = to put/leave a bag

The particle 을/를 marks the direct object, the thing being placed.

So:

• 가방을 = a bag as the thing being put down or left somewhere

If you used 가방이, it would change the role of bag in the sentence and would not fit this structure.

This is a very common Korean pattern:

• Verb stem + -면 안 돼요 = you must not... / it is not allowed to... / you shouldn’t...

Here:

• 두다 = to put, set down, leave
• verb stem = 두-
• 두면 = if you put/leave
• 안 돼요 = it’s not okay / it must not be done

So 두면 안 돼요 literally means:

• If you leave/put it, it is not okay

But in natural English, it means:

• You must not leave it
• Don’t leave it there

This structure is extremely common:

• 들어가면 안 돼요 = You must not go in.
• 사진 찍으면 안 돼요 = You must not take pictures.
• 여기에 앉으면 안 돼요 = You must not sit here.

That is just one of the standard Korean ways to express prohibition.

Korean often phrases rules as:

• Verb + -면 안 되다
• literally: if you do X, it does not become okay

This sounds indirect if translated word-for-word, but in real Korean it is a normal and natural way to say:

• don’t do X
• you must not do X
• it is not allowed to do X

A more direct command would be:

• 두지 마세요 = Don’t put/leave it.

But 두면 안 돼요 often sounds like a rule or policy, which fits this sentence well.

Both can relate to putting something somewhere, and in many cases they overlap.

• 놓다 = to put, place, set down
• 두다 = to put and leave there, to place something and let it stay

In this sentence, 두다 is especially appropriate because the meaning is not just set a bag down for a moment, but more like:

• leave a bag there
• place a bag there and keep it there

So 가방을 두면 안 돼요 suggests:

• Don’t leave a bag there.

If you said 가방을 놓으면 안 돼요, it would still be understandable, but 두다 fits the idea of leaving an item in that spot very well.

Not necessarily.

Even though 가방 is singular in form, Korean often uses a bare singular noun to talk about things in a general way.

So 가방을 두면 안 돼요 can mean:

• Don’t leave a bag there
• Don’t leave bags there

The sentence is really giving a general rule, not counting the exact number of bags.

In practice, it strongly suggests leaving a bag there.

Because the verb is 두다, the nuance is often:

• put something somewhere and leave it there

So in context, especially with a warning about an emergency exit, the intended meaning is probably:

• Do not leave bags in front of the emergency exit.

That is usually more natural in English than do not put a bag.

안 돼요 is polite everyday Korean.

It is appropriate in many normal situations, including spoken instructions and signs that are not extremely formal.

Some related levels are:

• 안 돼 = casual
• 안 돼요 = polite
• 안 됩니다 = more formal, often used in announcements, notices, rules, customer service, and official settings

So on an actual sign, you might also see:

• 가방을 두면 안 됩니다
• 가방을 두지 마십시오

Those are more formal than 안 돼요.

The sentence has the feeling of a rule or safety warning.

Because it mentions:

• the emergency exit
• a specific location
• -면 안 돼요 for prohibition

it sounds like a notice saying that area must be kept clear.

So the nuance is not just a casual suggestion. It is closer to:

• You are not allowed to leave bags there.
• That space must remain unobstructed.