Questions & Answers about Eignatjónið var mikið.
What does the -ið at the end of eignatjónið mean?
The -ið is the definite article, attached to the end of the noun.
So:
- eignatjón = property damage
- eignatjónið = the property damage
This is very common in Icelandic. Instead of putting a separate word like the before the noun, Icelandic often adds the article to the noun itself.
A few similar examples:
- hús = house
húsið = the house
- barn = child
- barnið = the child
So in Eignatjónið var mikið, the subject is specifically the property damage.
Why is the adjective mikið and not mikill or mikil?
Because mikið has to agree with eignatjónið in gender, number, and here also the basic predicate form.
The noun eignatjón is:
- neuter
- singular
So the adjective must also be neuter singular:
- mikill = masculine
- mikil = feminine
- mikið = neuter
That is why the sentence says:
- Eignatjónið var mikið.
This kind of agreement is a core feature of Icelandic grammar.
Why is it var?
Var is the past tense of vera (to be) in the 3rd person singular.
Since eignatjónið is a singular noun, Icelandic uses singular var:
- ég var = I was
- þú varst = you were
- hann/hún/það var = he/she/it was
So:
- Eignatjónið var mikið = The property damage was great/extensive
If the subject were plural, the verb would change:
- Tjónin voru mikil = The damages were great
What case is eignatjónið in here?
It is in the nominative case, because it is the subject of the sentence.
In a simple sentence with vera (to be), the thing being described is usually in the nominative:
- Húsið var stórt. = The house was big.
- Barnið var þreytt. = The child was tired.
Likewise:
- Eignatjónið var mikið.
The adjective mikið is not a separate object here; it is a predicate adjective describing the subject.
Is eignatjón one word? How is it built?
Yes, it is a compound noun, and compounds are extremely common in Icelandic.
It is made from:
- eign(a)- = property, possessions, assets
- tjón = damage, loss
So eignatjón literally means something like damage to property or property damage.
The first part appears as eigna-, which comes from a form related to eign / eignir. In compounds, Icelandic often uses a linking form like this.
You do not need to analyze every compound while speaking, but recognizing them helps a lot when reading Icelandic.
Why doesn’t the adjective also have a definite ending? Shouldn’t it somehow mean the great property damage?
In this sentence, mikið is not directly attached to the noun inside the noun phrase. It comes after var and works as a predicate adjective.
So the structure is:
- Eignatjónið = the property damage
- var mikið = was great / was extensive
This is different from an attributive adjective, where the adjective stands next to the noun.
Compare:
hið mikla eignatjón = the great/extensive property damage
- here the adjective is directly modifying the noun
eignatjónið var mikið = the property damage was great/extensive
- here the adjective comes after was
So mikið is correct as written.
How do you pronounce Eignatjónið var mikið?
A rough English-friendly guide would be:
- Eignatjónið ≈ AYG-na-tyoh-nith
- var ≈ var
- mikið ≈ MIH-kith
A few useful pronunciation notes:
- ei is usually pronounced like ay
- tj in modern Icelandic often sounds somewhat like ty
- ð is like the th in this (though at the end of a word it can be weaker)
- í is a long ee sound
This is only an approximation, but it can help you get started.
Does mikið mean big, great, or a lot here?
Here, mikið means something like:
- great
- extensive
- considerable
With damage, English often prefers extensive or serious rather than literally big, even though mikill/mikil/mikið often corresponds to big, great, or much/a lot depending on context.
So:
- Eignatjónið var mikið
can be understood as - The property damage was extensive
- The property damage was great
- There was major property damage
The exact English wording depends on style.
Could you also say Eignatjón var mikið without -ið?
Yes, you could, but it changes the meaning.
- Eignatjónið var mikið = The property damage was extensive
- Eignatjón var mikið = Property damage was extensive / There was extensive property damage
Without -ið, the noun is indefinite. That is often more general or less tied to a specific already-known event.
So the version with -ið sounds more like you are talking about a particular known damage situation.
Why is the word order so similar to English here?
Because this is a very basic Icelandic main clause, and in simple statements Icelandic often looks quite similar to English:
- Eignatjónið = subject
- var = verb
- mikið = complement
So the pattern is:
- Subject + verb + adjective
This is the same basic pattern as in:
- The house was big.
- Húsið var stórt.
However, Icelandic word order can become more different from English in other sentence types, especially because Icelandic has strong verb-second patterns and richer case marking.
What is the dictionary form of the words in this sentence?
The dictionary forms are:
- eignatjón = property damage
- vera = to be
- mikill = big, great, much
The forms in the sentence are inflected:
- eignatjónið = eignatjón
- var = past tense of vera
- mikið = neuter singular form of mikill
This is a very normal thing in Icelandic: the words you see in a sentence are often not exactly the same as the dictionary headword.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning IcelandicMaster Icelandic — from Eignatjónið var mikið to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions