Breakdown of Der Wartungsvertrag nennt die Wartungspauschale.
Questions & Answers about Der Wartungsvertrag nennt die Wartungspauschale.
Why does the sentence start with Der Wartungsvertrag? Is that the subject?
Yes. Der Wartungsvertrag is the subject of the sentence.
- der = the masculine singular nominative article
- Wartungsvertrag = maintenance contract
So Der Wartungsvertrag means the maintenance contract, and it is the thing doing the action of nennt.
Why is it der in Der Wartungsvertrag, but die in die Wartungspauschale?
Because the two nouns have different genders and different roles in the sentence.
- Wartungsvertrag is masculine, so in the nominative singular it takes der
- Wartungspauschale is feminine, and here it is the direct object, so in the accusative singular it takes die
That gives us:
- der Wartungsvertrag = nominative subject
- die Wartungspauschale = accusative object
For feminine nouns, die is used in both nominative and accusative singular, so the role is understood from the sentence structure and the verb.
What form is nennt?
nennt is the 3rd person singular present tense form of the verb nennen.
The conjugation is:
- ich nenne
- du nennst
- er/sie/es nennt
- wir nennen
- ihr nennt
- sie/Sie nennen
Since the subject is Der Wartungsvertrag (a singular noun), the verb must be nennt.
What does nennen mean here exactly?
Here, nennen means something like:
- to name
- to mention
- to state
- sometimes to specify
In a business or legal sentence like this one, nennt often sounds more like states or specifies than everyday calls.
So this is not necessarily about giving something a nickname. It is more likely saying that the contract mentions or states the maintenance fee.
Why is the verb in the second position?
Because this is a normal main clause, and German main clauses usually follow the verb-second rule.
The structure is:
- Der Wartungsvertrag = first element
- nennt = finite verb in second position
- die Wartungspauschale = rest of the sentence
That is standard German word order.
Are Wartungsvertrag and Wartungspauschale compound nouns?
Yes. Both are classic German compound nouns.
Wartungsvertrag
- Wartung = maintenance
- Vertrag = contract
So: maintenance contract
Wartungspauschale
- Wartung = maintenance
- Pauschale = flat fee / lump sum / fixed charge
So: maintenance flat fee or fixed maintenance charge
German often builds long nouns this way instead of using separate words like English does.
Why is there an -s- in Wartungsvertrag, but not in Wartungspauschale?
There is actually no extra -s- in Wartungsvertrag.
It is simply:
- Wartung
- Vertrag → Wartungsvertrag
The g of Wartung is followed directly by v of Vertrag.
In some German compounds, you do get a linking element such as -s-, called a Fugenlaut, but not here.
Example with a linking -s-:
- Arbeitsvertrag = work contract / employment contract
So this sentence does not show that pattern.
How do I know which noun is the object?
The object is die Wartungspauschale.
You can tell because:
- Der Wartungsvertrag is nominative, so it is the subject.
- nennen normally takes a direct object.
- The sentence pattern is the common German order: subject + verb + object.
So the contract is doing the naming/mentioning, and the maintenance fee is the thing being named/mentioned.
Could the word order be changed?
Yes, but it would sound more marked or stylistically different.
For example:
- Die Wartungspauschale nennt der Wartungsvertrag.
This is grammatically possible, but it puts stronger focus on die Wartungspauschale. In many contexts it sounds less natural than the original sentence.
The original version is the most neutral and straightforward:
- Der Wartungsvertrag nennt die Wartungspauschale.
Why are all these nouns capitalized?
Because all German nouns are capitalized.
So in this sentence:
- Wartungsvertrag is capitalized
- Wartungspauschale is capitalized
This is a basic spelling rule in German and applies whether the noun is simple or part of a compound.
Could nennt be replaced with heißt?
Usually not, because the meaning would change.
- nennen = to name, mention, state, call something
- heißen = to be called, to have the name
So:
- Der Wartungsvertrag nennt die Wartungspauschale.
= The contract mentions/states the maintenance fee.
But Die Wartungspauschale heißt ... would mean:
- The maintenance fee is called ...
That is a different structure and a different idea.
Why is there no article ending change on the nouns themselves?
Because in this sentence the case is mainly shown by the articles, not by noun endings.
Compare:
- der Wartungsvertrag
- die Wartungspauschale
The nouns Wartungsvertrag and Wartungspauschale stay the same. What changes is the article, depending on gender, number, and case.
This is very common in German, especially with singular nouns in simple sentence patterns.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning GermanMaster German — from Der Wartungsvertrag nennt die Wartungspauschale to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions