Breakdown of Dadurch, dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren, verhindern wir Datenverlust.
Questions & Answers about Dadurch, dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren, verhindern wir Datenverlust.
What does dadurch, dass mean here?
It is a common German way to express how something is achieved.
In this sentence, dadurch, dass ... means something like:
- by ...
- through the fact that ...
- by means of the fact that ...
So Dadurch, dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren, ... introduces the method or means by which the result happens.
A useful way to think about it:
- dadurch = through that / by that
- dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren = explains what that is
So dadurch points forward to the dass clause.
Why is there a comma after Dadurch?
Because dadurch, dass is a fixed construction in German punctuation.
The word dadurch is followed by a dass clause that explains it, and German normally separates that with a comma:
- Dadurch, dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren, ...
There is also a second comma after digitalisieren because the whole subordinate clause ends there, and then the main clause begins:
- Dadurch, dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren, verhindern wir Datenverlust.
So the commas are doing two jobs:
- introducing the dass clause
- closing that clause before the main clause starts
Why is digitalisieren at the end of the clause?
Because the clause beginning with dass is a subordinate clause, and in German subordinate clauses the conjugated verb normally goes to the end.
So:
- dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren
follows the standard subordinate-clause word order.
One small thing that can confuse learners: digitalisieren looks like an infinitive, but here it is actually the finite present-tense form for wir. In German, many verbs have the same form for:
- the infinitive: digitalisieren
- wir in the present tense: wir digitalisieren
- sie plural in the present tense: sie digitalisieren
So here it is not an infinitive; it is the normal verb form for wir.
Why does the main clause say verhindern wir instead of wir verhindern?
Because German main clauses follow the verb-second rule.
The first position in the sentence is already taken by the whole introductory element:
- Dadurch, dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren
That entire chunk counts as position 1. So the finite verb of the main clause must come next, in position 2:
- verhindern
Then comes the subject:
- wir
So the structure is:
- Position 1: Dadurch, dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren
- Position 2: verhindern
- then: wir Datenverlust
This is completely normal German word order.
What case is das Negativ, and why is it das?
Das Negativ is the direct object of digitalisieren, so it is in the accusative case.
The noun Negativ is neuter, so:
- nominative: das Negativ
- accusative: das Negativ
For neuter nouns, nominative and accusative look the same, which is why you still see das here.
So:
- wir digitalisieren das Negativ
means we digitize the negative, with das Negativ as the object.
Why is there no article before Datenverlust?
Because German often uses abstract nouns without an article when speaking generally.
Here Datenverlust means data loss in a general sense, so no article is needed:
- verhindern wir Datenverlust
This is similar to English, where we often say prevent data loss, not necessarily prevent the data loss.
You could use an article in a more specific context, for example if a particular data loss had already been mentioned. But in this sentence, the article-less version is the most natural.
Is Datenverlust one word because German likes compound nouns?
Yes. Datenverlust is a compound noun:
- Daten = data
- Verlust = loss
German very often combines nouns into one word. The final part usually tells you the basic category of the word, so Datenverlust is a kind of Verlust.
This is extremely common in German, and recognizing compounds will help a lot when reading.
Could I also say Indem wir das Negativ digitalisieren, verhindern wir Datenverlust?
Yes, that would also be correct and very natural.
Indem often corresponds to by doing ... in English and can express the method more directly.
So these are both good:
- Dadurch, dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren, verhindern wir Datenverlust.
- Indem wir das Negativ digitalisieren, verhindern wir Datenverlust.
A rough difference:
- indem is often a bit more compact and straightforward
- dadurch, dass can sound a bit more explanatory or explicit
In many contexts, they are very close in meaning.
Can the sentence also be written with the main clause first?
Yes. A very natural alternative is:
- Wir verhindern Datenverlust dadurch, dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren.
This has the same basic meaning.
The difference is mainly one of emphasis:
- starting with Dadurch, dass ... puts more focus on the method
- starting with Wir verhindern Datenverlust ... puts more focus on the result
Both are correct.
Why are Negativ and Datenverlust capitalized?
Because they are nouns, and in German all nouns are capitalized.
So:
- das Negativ
- der Datenverlust
This is one of the most noticeable spelling rules in German and applies regardless of where the noun appears in the sentence.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning GermanMaster German — from Dadurch, dass wir das Negativ digitalisieren, verhindern wir Datenverlust to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions