Mission—Team—FAQ—Privacy—Terms—Sponsors—Grammar—Typing Course—Donate

© 2026 Elon Automation B.V.

Learn Hardcore Esperanto: La legoma supo odoras bone. - The vegetable soup smells good.

Hardcore Esperanto
/Lesson 10
/La legoma supo odoras bone.

La legoma supo odoras bone.

Word

La legoma supo odoras bone.

Meaning

The vegetable soup smells good.

Part of speech

sentence

Pronunciation

Course

Hardcore Esperanto

Lesson

Breakdown of La legoma supo odoras bone.

Questions & Answers about La legoma supo odoras bone.

Why is it legoma supo and not legomo supo?

Because legoma is the adjective form of legomo (vegetable).

legomo = a vegetable
legoma = vegetable / made of vegetables / relating to vegetables

In Esperanto, when one noun describes another the way an English adjective does, you usually turn it into an adjective with -a:

frukto = fruit → frukta suko = fruit juice
legomo = vegetable → legoma supo = vegetable soup

So legoma supo literally means vegetable-type soup or soup made from vegetables.

Could this also be said as legomsupo?

Yes. Esperanto often allows compounds, so legomsupo is also possible.

legoma supo = vegetable soup
legomsupo = vegetable soup

Both are understandable. In many cases, the two-word version with an adjective feels a bit clearer for learners, while the compound can feel a bit more compact or lexicalized. You may see both in real Esperanto.

Why does odoras end in -as?

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Esperanto grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Esperanto now

The ending -as marks the present tense in Esperanto.

So:

odoras = smells / is smelling

The verb is based on odori = to smell. Esperanto verb endings are regular:

-as = present
-is = past
-os = future
-us = conditional
-u = command/jussive
-i = infinitive

Examples:

La supo odoras bone. = The soup smells good.
La supo odoris bone. = The soup smelled good.
La supo odoros bone. = The soup will smell good.

Why is it bone and not bona?

Because bone is an adverb, and here it modifies the verb odoras.

bona = good (adjective, used with nouns)
bone = well / in a good way (adverb, used with verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs)

In this sentence, the soup is not being directly described as good; rather, its smell is good. So Esperanto uses the adverb:

La supo odoras bone. = The soup smells good.

Compare:

La supo estas bona. = The soup is good.
La supo odoras bone. = The soup smells good.

This is similar to careful English grammar, where smells good is standard, not smells well.

Does odori mean to smell as in producing a smell, or to smell as in noticing a smell?

Usually odori means to have a smell / to give off an odor.

So in this sentence:

La legoma supo odoras bone. means
The vegetable soup smells good
that is, it gives off a pleasant smell.

If you want to talk about using your nose to notice a smell, Esperanto often uses a different wording, such as:

flari = to sniff / smell intentionally
senti odoron = to smell, to perceive a smell

So:

Mi flaras la supon. = I am smelling/sniffing the soup.
Mi sentas bonan odoron. = I smell a good smell.

Why is there no -n ending anywhere in the sentence?

Because there is no direct object here.

In Esperanto, -n marks the accusative, which is commonly used for the direct object. But in this sentence:

La legoma supo is the subject
odoras is the verb
bone is an adverb

Nothing is receiving the action as a direct object, so no accusative is needed.

Compare:

La legoma supo odoras bone. = The vegetable soup smells good.
Mi manĝas la legoman supon. = I eat the vegetable soup.

In the second sentence, la legoman supon gets -n because it is the direct object.

Why does la appear only once?

Because la legoma supo is one noun phrase: the vegetable soup.

The article la applies to the whole phrase, not separately to each word. Esperanto works like English here:

the vegetable soup not
the the vegetable soup

So:

la = the
legoma = vegetable
supo = soup

Together: la legoma supo.

Does la always mean the?

Yes, la is the definite article and corresponds to English the.

It does not change for:

singular/plural
gender
case by itself

Examples:

la supo = the soup
la supoj = the soups
la supon = the soup (as direct object)
la supojn = the soups (as direct objects)

The word la itself stays the same.

What is the basic word-by-word breakdown of the sentence?

Here is the structure:

La = the
legoma = vegetable / made of vegetables
supo = soup
odoras = smells
bone = well / nicely / good, in an adverbial sense

So literally it is something like:

The vegetable soup smells well/nicely

But the natural English translation is:

The vegetable soup smells good.

Can the word order be changed?

Yes, Esperanto word order is fairly flexible, but the normal order here is the most natural:

La legoma supo odoras bone.

You could also say:

Bone odoras la legoma supo.

This changes the emphasis, putting more focus on bone. But for ordinary neutral speech, the original order is best.

Why isn’t there a form of to be, like estas?

Because odoras is already the main verb, and it expresses the idea completely by itself.

La legoma supo estas bona. = The vegetable soup is good.
La legoma supo odoras bone. = The vegetable soup smells good.

These are different meanings:

estas bona = is good in general
odoras bone = smells good

So Esperanto does not need estas here.

Is odoro related to odoras?

Yes. They come from the same root odor-.

odoro = smell, odor
odori = to smell, to have a smell
odoras = smells
odora = odorous, having a smell
senodora = odorless

This is a good example of Esperanto word-building: one root can produce many related words through regular endings.

Does bone mean the smell is pleasant, or just strong?

It means the smell is good or pleasant, not merely noticeable or strong.

If you wanted to say the soup smells strongly, you would use a different word, such as:

La supo odoras forte. = The soup smells strongly.

So bone here expresses a positive judgment about the smell.

Could I say La legoma supo bonodoras?

Yes, that is possible.

bonodori = to smell good
La legoma supo bonodoras. = The vegetable soup smells good.

This is a compact form built from:

bon- = good
odor- = smell
-i = infinitive verb ending

However, odoras bone is often easier for learners to understand because it is more transparently built from common pieces.

What plural changes would happen if there were more than one soup?

You would make the noun and its adjective plural with -j:

La legomaj supoj odoras bone. = The vegetable soups smell good.

Notice:

legoma → legomaj
supo → supoj

The adjective agrees with the noun in number.

If the sentence were an object in a larger sentence, what would change?

The noun phrase would take -n, and the adjective would agree with it.

For example:

Mi manĝas la legoman supon. = I am eating the vegetable soup.

Here:

legoma → legoman
supo → supon

Adjectives agree with nouns in Esperanto for:

number (-j)
accusative (-n)

So if a noun gets -n, its adjective gets -n too.

Your questions are stored by us to improve Elon.io