Breakdown of La konflikto pri la hipoteko finiĝis.
Questions & Answers about La konflikto pri la hipoteko finiĝis.
Why is la used twice in La konflikto pri la hipoteko finiĝis?
Esperanto uses la for the, and it is used separately for each noun that is definite.
So:
- la konflikto = the conflict
- la hipoteko = the mortgage
Even though English also says the conflict about the mortgage, English learners sometimes expect only one the to cover the whole phrase. In Esperanto, each noun phrase gets its own article if needed.
What does pri mean here?
Pri usually means about, concerning, or regarding.
So:
- konflikto pri la hipoteko = conflict about the mortgage
It introduces the topic of the conflict. This is very common in Esperanto.
Examples:
- libro pri historio = a book about history
- demando pri la problemo = a question about the problem
Why is it hipoteko? Is that the normal Esperanto word for mortgage?
Yes. Hipoteko is the normal Esperanto word for mortgage in a financial/legal sense.
It is an international-looking word, so it may feel familiar if you know words like hypothec, hypothèque, hipoteca, or similar forms in other languages.
In this sentence:
- la hipoteko = the mortgage
What does finiĝis mean, and how is it built?
Finiĝis comes from:
- fin- = end, finish
- -iĝ- = become, get into a state
- -is = past tense
So finiĝis literally means something like became finished or came to an end.
In natural English here, that is simply:
- ended
- came to an end
So the whole sentence means that the conflict ended.
Why is it finiĝis and not finis?
This is a very common and important question.
- fini = to finish something
- finiĝi = to finish/end oneself, to come to an end
So:
- La konflikto finis... would sound incomplete or wrong unless the conflict is finishing something else
- La konflikto finiĝis means the conflict ended
Compare:
- Mi finis la libron. = I finished the book.
- La kunveno finiĝis. = The meeting ended.
The suffix -iĝ- often makes a verb intransitive, meaning the subject undergoes the change instead of doing it to an object.
Why is there no -n ending anywhere in the sentence?
There is no direct object here, so no accusative -n is needed.
Breakdown:
- La konflikto is the subject
- pri la hipoteko is a prepositional phrase
- finiĝis is an intransitive verb form
Since pri is a preposition, la hipoteko does not take -n just because it follows the preposition.
So this is completely normal:
- pri la hipoteko not
- pri la hipotekon
Could the sentence be translated as The dispute over the mortgage ended instead of The conflict about the mortgage ended?
Yes. That kind of variation is very normal.
Konflikto can mean:
- conflict
- dispute
- disagreement
And pri can be translated in different natural ways depending on context:
- about
- over
- concerning
- regarding
So possible English translations include:
- The conflict about the mortgage ended.
- The dispute over the mortgage ended.
- The disagreement concerning the mortgage ended.
If the meaning has already been given to the learner, the important grammar point is that pri marks the topic.
Is the word order fixed here?
The normal, neutral word order is:
- La konflikto pri la hipoteko finiĝis.
This is straightforward and natural: subject first, then the phrase describing it, then the verb.
Esperanto word order is more flexible than English, but this sentence is already in the most ordinary order.
You could rearrange it for emphasis in some contexts, but a learner should treat this version as the default pattern.
Why does konflikto end in -o?
In Esperanto, all singular nouns end in -o.
So:
- konflikt-o = conflict
- hipotek-o = mortgage
This is one of the most regular parts of Esperanto grammar.
If you made them plural, they would end in -oj:
- konfliktoj = conflicts
- hipotekoj = mortgages
How would this sentence look in the present or future tense?
The tense ending changes, but the rest stays the same.
- La konflikto pri la hipoteko finiĝas. = The conflict about the mortgage is ending / ends.
- La konflikto pri la hipoteko finiĝos. = The conflict about the mortgage will end.
This shows the regular Esperanto verb endings:
- -as = present
- -is = past
- -os = future
How is finiĝi different from just saying esti finita?
Both can relate to something being over, but they are not exactly the same.
- finiĝi = to end, to come to an end
- esti finita = to be finished
In many contexts, they are close:
- La konflikto finiĝis. = The conflict ended.
- La konflikto estas finita. = The conflict is finished.
But finiĝis focuses on the event of ending, while estas finita focuses on the resulting state.
So in this sentence, finiĝis is very natural because it describes the ending as something that happened.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning EsperantoMaster Esperanto — from La konflikto pri la hipoteko finiĝis to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions