Breakdown of Hvad angår indboet, dækker indboforsikringen det.
Questions & Answers about Hvad angår indboet, dækker indboforsikringen det.
What does hvad angår mean here?
Hvad angår means as for, regarding, or when it comes to.
So:
- Hvad angår indboet = As for the contents / Regarding the household contents
It is a fixed expression in Danish and is quite common in formal or neutral written language.
A more literal breakdown is:
- hvad = what
- angår = concerns / pertains to
But in normal English, you would not usually translate it word for word. You would translate the whole expression as as for or regarding.
Why is it indboet and not just indbo?
Because indboet is the definite form: the contents / the household contents.
- et indbo = contents / household effects / household contents
- indboet = the contents
Danish often adds the definite article to the end of the noun:
- en bil = a car
- bilen = the car
and for neuter nouns:
- et hus = a house
- huset = the house
Since indbo is a neuter noun (et indbo), the definite form is indboet.
What exactly does indbo mean?
Indbo means the movable things inside a home: furniture, electronics, clothes, and other household possessions.
It does not mean the building itself.
So it is closer to:
- household contents
- contents of the home
- sometimes household effects
This is why it appears in insurance language: indbo is what a contents insurance policy covers.
What does indboforsikringen mean, and how is it built?
Indboforsikringen means the contents insurance or the household contents insurance.
It is a compound noun:
- indbo = household contents
- forsikring = insurance
- indboforsikring = contents insurance
- indboforsikringen = the contents insurance
Danish makes compound nouns very freely, often where English uses separate words.
So:
- bilforsikring = car insurance
- rejseforsikring = travel insurance
- indboforsikring = contents insurance
And then the definite ending is added to the whole compound:
- indboforsikring → indboforsikringen
Why is the verb dækker before indboforsikringen?
This is because Danish is a V2 language in main clauses. That means the finite verb normally comes in the second position.
Here, the sentence starts with the fronted phrase:
- Hvad angår indboet = first position
So the finite verb comes next:
- dækker = second position
Then comes the subject:
- indboforsikringen
So the structure is:
- Hvad angår indboet, dækker indboforsikringen det.
If you remove the fronted phrase, the basic order would be:
- Indboforsikringen dækker det.
- The contents insurance covers it.
But once Hvad angår indboet is placed first, the verb must come before the subject:
- Hvad angår indboet, dækker indboforsikringen det.
This is very typical Danish word order.
Why do we need det at the end?
Because det is the direct object of dækker.
The phrase Hvad angår indboet introduces the topic, but it is not the grammatical object inside the main clause. The main clause still needs its own object:
- dækker = covers
- det = it
So the structure is essentially:
- As for the contents, the contents insurance covers it.
Even though indboet has already been mentioned, the main clause still refers back to it with det.
This is very natural in Danish with this kind of topic-setting phrase.
Why is the pronoun det and not den?
Because indbo is a neuter noun:
- et indbo
For pronouns referring back to a singular noun:
- common gender (en-word) → usually den
- neuter (et-word) → usually det
Since indbo is neuter, the correct pronoun is det.
Compare:
- en bil → den
- et hus → det
- et indbo → det
Is indbo singular or plural here? It seems to refer to many things.
Grammatically, indbo is singular, even though it refers to a collection of items.
This is similar to some English collective or mass-like nouns. In insurance language, indbo is treated as one category: household contents.
So Danish uses singular grammar:
- indboet
- det
even though the meaning includes many objects.
What does dækker mean here?
Dækker is the present tense of dække, which means to cover.
In an insurance context, dække means that an insurance policy pays for loss or damage.
So:
- Forsikringen dækker det = The insurance covers it
Other examples:
- Forsikringen dækker brand. = The insurance covers fire damage.
- Den dækker ikke tyveri. = It does not cover theft.
Why is there a comma after indboet?
The comma separates the introductory phrase from the main clause:
- Hvad angår indboet, = topic-setting phrase
- dækker indboforsikringen det. = main clause
In English, you would often do the same:
- As for the contents, the contents insurance covers it.
So the comma helps mark the pause and the structure of the sentence.
Is hvad angår formal?
Yes, it is somewhat neutral-to-formal, especially in writing.
It is perfectly natural, but it can sound more formal or structured than everyday speech.
Other ways to express a similar idea are:
- Med hensyn til indboet ... = With regard to the contents ...
- Når det gælder indboet ... = When it comes to the contents ...
- Angående indboet ... = Regarding the contents ...
So hvad angår is correct and natural, especially in informational or administrative language.
Could the sentence be written as Indboforsikringen dækker indboet instead?
Yes, that is grammatically possible, but it is not exactly the same in emphasis.
- Indboforsikringen dækker indboet.
= The contents insurance covers the contents.
This is simpler, but it sounds a bit repetitive and less elegant.
- Hvad angår indboet, dækker indboforsikringen det.
= As for the contents, the contents insurance covers it.
This version highlights indboet as the topic first, perhaps because the speaker is discussing several categories, such as the building, the contents, liability, and so on.
So the original sentence is more discourse-oriented: it says, in effect, Now, regarding the contents...
Can hvad angår be followed by other nouns too?
Yes. It is a general expression.
Examples:
Hvad angår prisen, er den rimelig.
= As for the price, it is reasonable.Hvad angår børnene, kommer de senere.
= As for the children, they are coming later.Hvad angår vejret, ser det fint ud.
= As for the weather, it looks fine.
So in your sentence, indboet is just the thing being singled out as the topic.
Is this sentence natural Danish?
Yes. It is natural, especially in explanatory or insurance-related language.
It sounds like something you might read in:
- an insurance brochure
- a policy explanation
- a FAQ
- an informational text
It is not especially casual, but it is clear and idiomatic.
How would a native speaker probably stress this sentence?
The likely stress would be on the topic and the important insurance term:
Hvad angår INDboet, DÆKker indboforsikringen det.
In context, the sentence is probably contrasting indboet with something else, such as:
- the building
- damage to others
- legal protection
- accident insurance
So the fronted phrase helps organize the information: as for the contents...
What is the basic grammar pattern of the whole sentence?
A useful way to see it is:
Topic-setting phrase
Hvad angår indboet = As for the contentsMain clause with V2 word order
dækker indboforsikringen det = the contents insurance covers it
So the overall pattern is:
- As for X, [verb] [subject] [object].
In Danish:
- Hvad angår X, verb subject object.
That is a very helpful pattern to recognize and reuse.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DanishMaster Danish — from Hvad angår indboet, dækker indboforsikringen det to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions