كل ما يبص من الشباك، بيشوف القطة تحت العربية.

كل ما is a very common Egyptian Arabic expression meaning whenever, every time, or any time that. It does not mean a literal word-for-word all what here.

So كل ما يبص من الشباك means whenever he looks out the window or every time he looks out the window.

It introduces a repeated situation:

• action 1: he looks out the window
• result: he sees the cat under the car

In Egyptian Arabic, بـ on a verb often marks the habitual or ongoing present.

So:

• بيشوف = he sees
• بيبص = he looks

But after expressions like كل ما, it is very common for the verb in that clause to appear without بـ:

• كل ما يبص... = whenever he looks...

Then the main/result clause can still use the regular present with بـ:

• بيشوف القطة... = he sees the cat...

So this contrast is normal and natural in Egyptian Arabic.

The subject is understood from the verb form itself.

Both يبص and بيشوف are third person masculine singular, so the meaning is he looks and he sees.

Egyptian Arabic often leaves out subject pronouns when the verb already makes the subject clear. So you do not need to say هو unless you want extra emphasis or contrast.

These two verbs are related to vision, but they are not the same.

• يبص means to look, to glance, or to direct one’s eyes
• يشوف means to see

So the sentence works like this:

• يبص من الشباك = he looks out the window
• بيشوف القطة = he sees the cat

This is very similar to the English difference between look and see.

Yes, literally من الشباك is from the window, but in Egyptian Arabic this is a normal way to express out of or through the window.

So:

• يبص من الشباك = he looks out the window / he looks through the window

English and Arabic do not always use the same preposition in these situations. In Egyptian Arabic, من is very natural here.

Usually not if you mean out the window.

• من الشباك gives the sense of looking through/out of the window
• في الشباك would sound more like in the window or at the window, depending on context

So for this sentence, من الشباك is the natural choice.

They are definite because the sentence is talking about the cat and the car, not just any cat or any car.

• القطة = the cat
• العربية = the car

Arabic uses the definite article ال much like English uses the. In this sentence, the speaker is probably referring to a specific cat and a specific car that are visible or already known in context.

If you wanted them indefinite, you would say:

• قطة = a cat
• عربية = a car

Yes, in Egyptian Arabic عربية very often means car.

This is one of the first vocabulary surprises for many learners.

So:

• العربية here = the car
• not the Arabic one and not the Arabic language

Context makes it clear. After تحت, the meaning under the car is the natural one.

تحت itself means under or below, so no extra preposition is needed.

• تحت العربية = under the car

This is normal Arabic structure:

• فوق الترابيزة = on the table / above the table
• تحت العربية = under the car

So تحت already does the job that under does in English.

In pronunciation, the l of ال is absorbed here because ش is a sun letter.

So:

• written: الشباك
• pronounced: ish-shubbāk or similar, depending on your transliteration style

This is why learners often hear something like ish-shubbāk, not el-shubbāk.

By contrast:

• القطة keeps the l sound, because ق is not a sun letter
• العربية also keeps the l sound

So you would hear something like:

• ish-shubbāk
• il-ʔoṭṭa
• il-ʿarabeyya

A natural Egyptian-style transliteration would be:

Koll ma yeboṣṣ men ish-shubbāk, biyshūf il-ʔoṭṭa taḥt il-ʿarabeyya.

You may also see slightly different spellings in transliteration, because transliteration systems vary. For example:

• koll or kul
• men or min
• biyshuf or biyshūf
• ʔoṭṭa or otta

Those differences are normal.

This order is very natural because it puts the whenever clause first:

• كل ما يبص من الشباك، بيشوف القطة تحت العربية.

That is like saying:

• Whenever he looks out the window, he sees the cat under the car.

You could sometimes move things around in conversation, but this version is clear and idiomatic. Starting with كل ما is a very common way to frame the sentence, because it sets up the repeated condition before giving the result.