صب القهوة في ابريق القهوة.

Yes. صبّ means pour! and here it is an imperative.

In this sentence, it is addressed to one male. That is the basic singular masculine command form.

Useful related forms:

• صبّ = pour! (to one man)
• صُبّي = pour! (to one woman)
• صُبّوا = pour! (to a group)

A rough Egyptian pronunciation would be:

Sobb il-ʔahwa fi ʔibrīʔ il-ʔahwa.

A few pronunciation notes:

• ال is usually pronounced il or el
• قهوة in Egyptian is usually ʔahwa / ahwa
• ق often becomes a glottal stop ʔ in Egyptian speech
• إبريق is often pronounced something like ʔibrīʔ

So القهوة does not sound like full Standard Arabic al-qahwa in everyday Egyptian.

Because that is very normal in Arabic, especially in commands.

Arabic often likes:

• Verb + object + other details

So:

• صب القهوة في ابريق القهوة

is a very natural structure for Pour the coffee into the coffee pot.

English commands also start with the verb, so in this case the two languages match nicely.

في basically means in.

But after verbs like put, pour, or throw, Arabic often uses في where English prefers into.

So literally, the Arabic is closer to:

• Pour the coffee in the coffee pot

But natural English says:

• Pour the coffee into the coffee pot

So this is a normal Arabic usage, not a mistake.

Because ابريق القهوة is an iḍāfa construction, often called the construct phrase.

This is a very common Arabic pattern:

• noun + noun
• meaning the X of the Y or Y X

So:

• إبريق القهوة = the coffee pot
• literally, something like the pot of the coffee

In an iḍāfa:

• the first noun usually does not take ال
• the second noun can make the whole phrase definite

So even without ال on إبريق, the whole phrase can still mean the coffee pot.

Because the two instances do different jobs.

• The first القهوة is the thing being poured
• The second القهوة is part of the phrase إبريق القهوة, meaning coffee pot

So the sentence structure is:

• صب = pour
• القهوة = the coffee
• في إبريق القهوة = into the coffee pot

This repetition is completely normal in Arabic.

Yes, in standard spelling, إبريق is the more correct form.

You may see:

• إبريق in careful or standard writing
• ابريق in casual writing where hamzas are often left out

So for learning and formal writing, it is better to remember:

• إبريق

It is understandable in Egyptian Arabic, but the written form looks fairly close to Standard Arabic.

What makes it Egyptian is mostly the pronunciation, for example:

• القهوة pronounced il-ʔahwa / el-ahwa
• ق often becoming ʔ

Also, in everyday Egyptian, speakers might choose a different word depending on the exact kind of pot. But as a learning sentence, this one is clear and acceptable.

Because ordinary Arabic writing usually leaves out short vowels.

Also, in Egyptian Arabic, speakers do not use the full case ending system that you learn in Standard Arabic grammar.

So in everyday writing, you normally see:

• صب القهوة في ابريق القهوة

not a fully vowelled version.

That is normal and expected.

The imperative changes depending on who you are speaking to.

• To one man: صبّ القهوة في إبريق القهوة
• To one woman: صُبّي القهوة في إبريق القهوة
• To a group: صُبّوا القهوة في إبريق القهوة

So yes, Arabic commands change for gender and number.

A simple way is to add لو سمحت before it.

For example:

• لو سمحت، صبّ القهوة في إبريق القهوة
• If you please, pour the coffee into the coffee pot

If speaking to a woman:

• لو سمحتي، صُبّي القهوة في إبريق القهوة

Arabic often makes requests polite by adding expressions like please, rather than changing the verb form itself.