بالنسبة للجدول، مركز التدريب بعته.

بالنسبة لـ is a very common expression meaning as for, regarding, or with regard to.

So بالنسبة للجدول sets up the schedule as the topic of the sentence. It is not the main subject of the verb; it is more like a topic phrase at the front.

A very literal feel would be:

As for the schedule, ...

That is why there is a pause/comma after it.

Because بالنسبة normally takes the preposition لـ after it.

So the pattern is:

بالنسبة لـ + noun

When لـ comes before a word that already has الـ, the spelling becomes للـ:

• لـ + الجدول = للجدول

In Egyptian pronunciation, this is typically something like lel-gadwal.

That -ه is an object pronoun meaning it.

This happens because الجدول has been moved to the front as a topic. In Arabic, when you do that, it is very common to still keep a pronoun inside the main clause referring back to that topic.

So the structure is roughly:

• بالنسبة للجدول = as for the schedule
• مركز التدريب بعته = the training center sent it

That pronoun -ه is the it.

This kind of resumptive pronoun is very common in both spoken and written Arabic.

Here بعته is the verb بعت (sent) plus the object pronoun -ه (him/it).

In this sentence it means:

sent it

In Egyptian Arabic, the final -ه after a verb is often pronounced more like -o than full -hu, so بعته here would usually sound like baʿato.

Arabic spelling usually leaves out short vowels, so بعته can be ambiguous on its own.

Depending on context, it could represent different spoken forms. But in this sentence, the context makes it clear:

• مركز التدريب is the subject
• الجدول is the thing being referred to
• so بعته here is understood as sent it

In other words, the sentence structure tells you how to read it.

That is a good question. In Egyptian Arabic, subject-first order is very common, especially in everyday speech.

So:

• مركز التدريب بعته = The training center sent it

sounds very natural.

After a topic phrase like بالنسبة للجدول, a subject-first clause is especially normal. Egyptian Arabic generally uses SVO more freely than formal written Arabic does.

Because this is an iḍāfa construction, often called a possessive/construct phrase.

Literally, مركز التدريب is:

center of the training

but in English we naturally say:

the training center

In an iḍāfa:

• the first noun usually does not take الـ
• the second noun can take الـ
• if the second noun is definite, the whole phrase becomes definite

So:

• مركز تدريب = a training center
• مركز التدريب = the training center

Because الجدول is grammatically masculine singular, and -ه is the matching object pronoun for him/it in the masculine singular.

So:

• الجدول → masculine singular
• pronoun referring back to it → -ه

If the noun were feminine, you would expect -ها instead.

A natural Egyptian-style pronunciation would be roughly:

bennesba lel-gadwal, markaz et-tadrīb baʿato

A few useful pronunciation notes:

• بالنسبة → bennesba
• الجدول in Egyptian is usually el-gadwal or il-gadwal
• التدريب starts with ت, so the ال assimilates: et-tadrīb
• بعته here is commonly pronounced baʿato

No. بعت / يبعت is a normal, common verb in Egyptian Arabic for send.

It is much more natural in everyday speech than a more formal choice like أرسل.

So بعته sounds like ordinary spoken Egyptian, not stiff formal Arabic.