شنطة نقل الحيوانات عند الباب.

In Arabic, the present-tense verb to be is usually left out.

So:

شنطة نقل الحيوانات عند الباب

literally looks like:

pet carrier at the door

but it naturally means:

The pet carrier is at the door.

If you wanted was, will be, etc., Arabic would use extra words, but in the simple present, no is is needed.

Because this is a kind of noun chain called an iḍāfa construction.

In Arabic, the first noun in this kind of phrase usually does not take الـ, even when the whole phrase is definite.

Here, the phrase is built so that definiteness comes from the last noun:

شنطة نقل الحيوانات

Because الحيوانات is definite, the whole expression can be understood as definite too.

So Arabic does not need to say:

الشنطة نقل...

That would be ungrammatical here.

It is basically:

• شنطة = bag
• نقل = transporting / transport
• الحيوانات = the animals

So the structure is roughly:

bag of transporting animals
or more naturally in English:
animal carrier / pet carrier

This is very common in Arabic: instead of using lots of adjectives, Arabic often stacks nouns together to make a compound meaning.

Here نقل is not functioning as a finite verb like he transported.

It is a verbal noun (often called a maṣdar) meaning transporting or transport.

So in this sentence, it works like a noun inside the larger phrase:

شنطة نقل الحيوانات
= a bag for transporting animals

English often uses a noun like carrier here, but Arabic can express that idea with bag + transport + animals.

Here عند means at, by, or near.

So:

عند الباب = at the door / by the door

This is different from:

• في الباب = in the door (not what you want here)
• على الباب = on the door

So عند is the natural choice for saying something is located by a place.

Yes, literally الحيوانات means the animals.

But in Arabic, a definite noun can sometimes refer to a whole class or category, especially inside compound expressions like this. So it does not necessarily mean a specific set of animals already mentioned in the conversation.

In context, شنطة نقل الحيوانات is understood as something like:

animal transport bag
or
pet carrier

If you specifically wanted to say pets, you might use a more specific expression such as الحيوانات الأليفة.

A typical Egyptian pronunciation would be:

shanṭet naʔl il-ḥayawānāt ʿand il-bāb

A couple of useful things to notice:

• شنطة by itself is usually shanṭa
• before another noun in this kind of construction, it becomes shanṭet
• الـ is usually pronounced il- in Egyptian Arabic
• نقل is commonly pronounced naʔl

So the pronunciation changes a little from the spelling, especially in connected speech.

Because the word ends in ة (tāʾ marbūṭa).

When the word stands alone, it is usually pronounced like -a:

شنطة → shanṭa

But when it is linked to another noun in a construct phrase, that ة is pronounced as -t:

شنطة نقل → shanṭet naʔl

This is a very common pattern, and learners hear it all the time in Arabic noun chains.

The given order is natural:

شنطة نقل الحيوانات عند الباب
= The pet carrier is at the door.

But Arabic can move the location phrase for emphasis:

عند الباب شنطة نقل الحيوانات

That puts more focus on at the door.

So the meaning stays very similar, but the emphasis changes.

It would be understood in both.

The spelling is fairly neutral, but the pronunciation is what makes it Egyptian in practice. Egyptian Arabic would pronounce it without case endings and with Egyptian sounds like:

il-bāb, not a fully inflected formal ending.

So you can think of this sentence as something that is perfectly understandable in Egyptian, even though its written form also looks quite standard.