شنطة النوم وشنطة الاسعافات الاولية في الخيمة.

A natural pronunciation would be:

shantet en-nōm wi shantet il-isʿafāt il-awwaliyya fil-khēma

A few notes:

• و is often pronounced wi or we in Egyptian, not the careful Standard Arabic wa
• في الخيمة often runs together in speech as fil-khēma
• Transliteration varies, so you may also see el- instead of il-

Because in Arabic, present-tense sentences like X is in Y or X are in Y usually do not use a separate verb for is/are.

So:

شنطة النوم وشنطة الإسعافات الأولية في الخيمة
literally looks like
the sleeping bag and the first aid bag in the tent

but it naturally means
The sleeping bag and the first aid kit are in the tent.

If you want to make the idea of presence more explicit, Egyptian Arabic often adds موجودين:

شنطة النوم وشنطة الإسعافات الأولية موجودين في الخيمة
The sleeping bag and the first aid kit are in the tent.

Because Arabic normally repeats the head noun when you are talking about two different kinds of bag:

• شنطة النوم = the sleeping bag
• شنطة الإسعافات الأولية = the first aid bag/kit

If you said it only once, it could sound unclear or like you are describing one bag in two ways. Repeating شنطة makes it clear that these are two separate items.

This is because of the ة at the end, called taa marbuuTa.

In Egyptian Arabic:

• when the word stands alone, شنطة is usually pronounced shanta
• when it is linked to another noun in a construct phrase, the t sound comes out: shantet

So:

• شنطة = shanta
• شنطة النوم = shantet en-nōm

This is very common and important to get used to.

Because this is an iDaafa construction, often called a construct phrase.

In this structure:

• the first noun usually does not take الـ
• the whole phrase becomes definite if the second noun is definite

So:

• شنطة النوم = literally bag of the sleep
• because النوم is definite, the whole phrase is understood as the sleeping bag

And similarly:

• شنطة الإسعافات الأولية = the first aid bag/kit

So even without الـ on شنطة, the whole phrase can still mean the ... bag.

They are both iDaafa phrases.

This is a very common Arabic pattern:

noun + noun

where the second noun defines or specifies the first.

Examples here:

• شنطة النوم = literally bag of sleep → sleeping bag
• شنطة الإسعافات الأولية = literally bag of first aid → first aid kit/bag

So instead of using an adjective like English often does, Arabic frequently uses this noun-plus-noun structure.

Because ن is a sun letter.

The Arabic definite article الـ changes its pronunciation before sun letters. In Egyptian Arabic, el- / il- often assimilates to the first consonant of the word.

So:

• النوم is pronounced en-nōm, not el-nōm

But in الخيمة, the خ is not a sun letter, so the l sound stays:

• الخيمة = el-khēma

This is why the two الـ’s sound different.

Yes, في الخيمة is the normal, straightforward way to say in the tent.

• في = in
• الخيمة = the tent

If you want to stress inside, Egyptian Arabic often uses جوه:

شنطة النوم وشنطة الإسعافات الأولية جوه الخيمة
The sleeping bag and the first aid kit are inside the tent.

So:

• في الخيمة = in the tent
• جوه الخيمة = inside the tent

Because in casual Arabic typing, people often leave out some spelling details, especially hamza.

So both of these may appear:

• الاسعافات الاولية = casual typing
• الإسعافات الأولية = more standard spelling

For learners, it is good to know the standard form is:

الإسعافات الأولية

But in everyday texting or informal writing, dropping the hamzas is very common.

It is understandable and mostly natural, but different parts feel different in style:

• شنطة and خيمة are everyday Egyptian words
• الإسعافات الأولية is a standard expression and can sound a bit more formal or textbook-like, though it is still very common and widely understood

One extra note: if you specifically mean a camping sleeping bag, many Egyptians also say كيس نوم. So in very everyday speech, you might also hear:

كيس النوم وشنطة الإسعافات الأولية في الخيمة

But the original sentence is still clear and usable.