Questions & Answers about Aion hakea liidun.
Why is the object liidun in the genitive-accusative case here, even though the verb directly before it is an infinitive?
In predicate chaining, the infinitive (hakea) inherits its object rules from the main verb (aion). Because the main verb has a normal personal subject (the implied 'I' from the -n ending), the total object takes the standard genitive-accusative ending -n. If the main verb lacked a personal subject (for example, in the imperative Hae liitu!), the object would take the nominative form instead.
Why does aion chain with the first infinitive (hakea) instead of the third infinitive (hakemaan)?
Verbs expressing intention, will, or capability—like aikoa, haluta, and voida—act as modal verbs and always chain with the basic first infinitive. You would only use the third infinitive (the -maan / -mään form) if the main verb expressed motion (like mennä) or the beginning of an action (like ruveta).
Does hakea always take a total object when it means 'to fetch'?
Not always! It depends entirely on whether the object is a complete, countable thing or an uncountable mass. Here, you intend to fetch a single, whole piece of chalk, so it takes the total object case (liidun). If you were fetching an unspecified amount of something (like coffee), it would take the partitive case instead: Aion hakea kahvia.
I know liitu means chalk. Just as a quick refresher, why does the t change to d in liidun?
Adding the -n object ending closes the final syllable of the word (making it end in a consonant). This triggers consonant gradation, weakening the single t in the strong grade (liitu) to a d in the weak grade (liidun).
Learn Aion hakea liidun and more in Finnish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free