Learn Finnish: Hirmumyrskyn johdosta moni talo tuhoutui. - Due to the hurricane, many houses were destroyed.

All three postpositions mean 'because of' or 'due to' and require the preceding noun to be in the genitive case (hirmumyrskyn). However, johdosta is more formal and often used in official contexts, news reports, or to emphasize a direct logical result. Vuoksi and takia would also be grammatically correct here, but johdosta fits the serious, news-like tone of a natural disaster.

Why is moni talo in the singular when the English translation says 'many houses'?

In Finnish, the pronoun moni (many) is very often paired with a singular noun, similar to saying 'many a house' in English. When this singular block acts as the subject, the verb must also be in the singular, which is why we use tuhoutui instead of the plural tuhoutuivat. You could also say monet talot tuhoutuivat, but the singular structure is extremely common and natural in Finnish.

The English translation says 'were destroyed', so why isn't the Finnish verb in the passive form (tuhottiin)?

The Finnish passive is strictly used when an unknown human agent performs the action. Because a hurricane is a natural force, we cannot use the true passive here. Instead, Finnish uses the automative verb tuhoutua (to get destroyed / to perish), which describes something happening to a subject without direct human intervention.

Could the phrase hirmumyrskyn johdosta be placed at the end of the sentence?