Minä en heitä kiviä karhuille.

Questions & Answers about Minä en heitä kiviä karhuille.

How is the allative plural karhuille formed here?
The basic word is karhu (bear). To say "to the bears" or "at the bears", we need the plural marker -i- and the allative ending -lle. Because karhu ends in -u, the plural -i- is added directly without changing the stem: karhu + i + lle = karhuille.
Why is the word for stones (kiviä) in the partitive case?
In Finnish, the object of a negative sentence must always be in the partitive case. Because you are talking about stones in general, it uses the plural partitive. The basic word kivi (stone) takes the plural marker -i- and the partitive ending -ä, becoming kiviä.
Why does the verb "throw" look like heitä instead of heittää?
In negative sentences, the main verb drops the personal ending (like the -n in the "minä" form). The dictionary form is heittää. When conjugated, the strong -tt- weakens to -t- due to consonant gradation, giving the "minä" form heitän. Dropping the -n for the negative form leaves us with heitä.
Doesn't heitä also mean "them"?
Yes, it's a funny coincidence! Heitä is the partitive form of the pronoun he (they), so it often translates to "them". However, in this sentence, it comes directly after the negative verb en, which makes it clear that it's acting as the verb "throw" here.

Learn Minä en heitä kiviä karhuille and more in Finnish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free